[STLinux Kernel] [PATCH v2 2/4] remoteproc: dt: Provide bindings for ST's Remote Processor Controller driver
From: Lee Jones <hidden>
Date: 2015-09-01 09:14:55
Also in:
linux-devicetree, lkml
On Tue, 01 Sep 2015, Peter Griffin wrote:
Hi Lee, On Fri, 28 Aug 2015, Lee Jones wrote:quoted
Signed-off-by: Ludovic Barre <redacted> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <redacted> --- .../devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/st-rproc.txt | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/st-rproc.txtThe patch documening the DT bindings should be ordered before the patch which adds the DT node to aid reviewing.quoted
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/st-rproc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/st-rproc.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..fbd7d78 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/st-rproc.txt@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ +STMicroelectronics Remote Processor +----------------------------------- + +This binding provides support for adjunct processors found on ST SoCs. + +The remote processors can be controlled from the bootloader or the primary OS. +If the bootloader starts a remote processor processor the primary OS must detect +its state and act accordingly. + +Required properties: +- compatible Should be one of: + "st,st231-rproc" + "st,st40-rproc"st40-proc isn't used anywhere. The stih407 doesn't have a ST40 copro, and looking in the vendor tree remoteproc support isn't present for stih415/6 which are the the only upstream SoC's to have a ST40 co-pro. So I think st40-rproc support can be removed.quoted
+- reg Size and length of reserved co-processor memory +- resets Reset lines (See: ../reset/reset.txt) +- reset-names Must be "sw_reset" and "pwr_reset"pwr_reset isn't used by any of the st231 co-processors. It seems to be related to ST40 support which I don't think is required upstream. Removing it would make the driver a fair bit smaller.quoted
+- clocks Clock for co-processor (See: ../clock/clock-bindings.txt) +- clock-names Must be "rproc_clk"I can't see any co-pro which uses more than one clock, so clock-names looks superflous.quoted
+- clock-frequency Clock frequency to set co-processor at if the bootloader + hasn't already done so +- st,syscfg-boot The register that holds the boot vector for the co-processorI would prefer to see this binding match how most other sti drivers reference syscfg registers which is: - st,syscfg = <&syscfg_core 0xf4>; Description: phandle of sysconfig bank plus integer array containing register offsets. It also means it is easily extendable if more than one syscfg register is required in the future to boot a co-pro.
Ack. Good points, will fix. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog