On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Mark Brown [off-list ref] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 01:38:57PM +0200, Michael van der Westhuizen wrote:
quoted
quoted
It's possible there was some discussion of the patch that made
it look it needed a resubmit, or that it was buried as reply in the
middle of discussion of some other patches (eg, a previous version).
Either way to repeat what I said if you want me to review a patch please
send me the patch.
quoted
I?ve just resent the series.
You've sent them as a reply in the middle of another thread which is
something I just indicated above was a bad idea in the message you're
replying to here (it's a great way to either make it hard to figure out
what the current version of the code is or get your message deleted
along with the rest of the thread) and you've decided to label them as
[RESEND instead of [PATCH :(
Michael, I believe you need to resend as a v3 in a separate thread if
you aware of this code.
(Though it seems already late for v4.3)
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko