On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 10:50:52AM -0700, Loc Ho wrote:
I intentional left this code as is so that the driver will still works
with older version of the EDAC code.
Huh, what? I don't think this is how upstream development works.
I had already reversed the logic for the L3 and SoC. Are you asking
for the MC/PMD (earlier posting)? The MC/PMD routine isn't that big.
Functions in general fit in an screen of 80 column?
Only for the ones where it becomes clumsy and flipping it would make the
code more readable. I'm not a hard 80 cols follower anyway.
So, is there something that I am missing?
I hope you're not. But seeing the custom debugfs stuff left in the new
submission without any comment as to *why* you've left it, made me think
you didn't incorporate all feedback.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--