Thread (4 messages) flat view 4 messages, 3 authors, 2015-08-12

[PATCH v4 2/2] mfd: axp20x: Add a cell for the usb power_supply part of the axp20x PMICs

From: Lee Jones <hidden>
Date: 2015-08-12 09:29:00
Also in: linux-devicetree, linux-pm

On Wed, 12 Aug 2015, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,

On 11-08-15 16:18, Lee Jones wrote:
quoted
On Sat, 08 Aug 2015, Hans de Goede wrote:
quoted
Add a cell for the usb power_supply part of the axp20x PMICs.

Note that this cell is only for the usb power_supply part and not the
ac-power / battery-charger / rtc-backup-bat-charger bits.

Depending on the board each of those must be enabled / disabled separately
in devicetree as most boards do not use all 4. So in dt each one needs its
own child-node of the axp20x node. Another reason for using separate child
nodes for each is so that other devicetree nodes can have a power-supply
property with a phandle referencing a node representing a single
power-supply.

The decision to use a separate devicetree node for each is reflected on
the kernel side by each getting its own mfd-cell / platform_device and
platform-driver.

Note this commit also makes some whitespace changes to the intialization
of existing cells in axp20x_cells, these are pure whitespace changes,
functionally nothing changes.

Cc: Bruno Pr?mont <bonbons@linux-vserver.org>
Signed-off-by: Bruno Pr?mont <bonbons@linux-vserver.org>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <redacted>
Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <redacted>
Acked-by: Lee Jones <redacted>
---
Changes in v2:
-Use DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED
-Change indentation of axp20x_cells initializers to avoid line wrapping
Changes in v3:
-Improve commit message
-Add Bruno's S-o-b
---
 drivers/mfd/axp20x.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Applied, thanks.
Great, but I'm not seeing this in:

https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/lee/mfd.git/log/?h=for-mfd-next
Well it does usually take me a day or two push my local branch out,
however in this case I had actually dropped a ball somewhere.  I've
been through my backlog of 'applied' patches and these two are the
only ones I failed to pick.  I have now, re-picked, re-applied and
pushed the branch out.  Let me know if something is still not right.

Sorry for the inconvenience.
quoted
quoted
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/axp20x.c b/drivers/mfd/axp20x.c
index d9f2f96..3f576b7 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/axp20x.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/axp20x.c
@@ -140,6 +140,13 @@ static struct resource axp20x_pek_resources[] = {
 	},
 };

+static struct resource axp20x_usb_power_supply_resources[] = {
+	DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(AXP20X_IRQ_VBUS_PLUGIN, "VBUS_PLUGIN"),
+	DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(AXP20X_IRQ_VBUS_REMOVAL, "VBUS_REMOVAL"),
+	DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(AXP20X_IRQ_VBUS_VALID, "VBUS_VALID"),
+	DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(AXP20X_IRQ_VBUS_NOT_VALID, "VBUS_NOT_VALID"),
+};
+
 static struct resource axp22x_pek_resources[] = {
 	{
 		.name   = "PEK_DBR",
@@ -432,11 +439,16 @@ static const struct regmap_irq_chip axp288_regmap_irq_chip = {

 static struct mfd_cell axp20x_cells[] = {
 	{
-		.name			= "axp20x-pek",
-		.num_resources		= ARRAY_SIZE(axp20x_pek_resources),
-		.resources		= axp20x_pek_resources,
+		.name		= "axp20x-pek",
+		.num_resources	= ARRAY_SIZE(axp20x_pek_resources),
+		.resources	= axp20x_pek_resources,
 	}, {
-		.name			= "axp20x-regulator",
+		.name		= "axp20x-regulator",
+	}, {
+		.name		= "axp20x-usb-power-supply",
+		.of_compatible	= "x-powers,axp202-usb-power-supply",
+		.num_resources	= ARRAY_SIZE(axp20x_usb_power_supply_resources),
+		.resources	= axp20x_usb_power_supply_resources,
 	},
 };
-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help