[PATCH v4 2/2] mfd: axp20x: Add a cell for the usb power_supply part of the axp20x PMICs
From: Lee Jones <hidden>
Date: 2015-08-12 09:29:00
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-pm
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi, On 11-08-15 16:18, Lee Jones wrote:quoted
On Sat, 08 Aug 2015, Hans de Goede wrote:quoted
Add a cell for the usb power_supply part of the axp20x PMICs. Note that this cell is only for the usb power_supply part and not the ac-power / battery-charger / rtc-backup-bat-charger bits. Depending on the board each of those must be enabled / disabled separately in devicetree as most boards do not use all 4. So in dt each one needs its own child-node of the axp20x node. Another reason for using separate child nodes for each is so that other devicetree nodes can have a power-supply property with a phandle referencing a node representing a single power-supply. The decision to use a separate devicetree node for each is reflected on the kernel side by each getting its own mfd-cell / platform_device and platform-driver. Note this commit also makes some whitespace changes to the intialization of existing cells in axp20x_cells, these are pure whitespace changes, functionally nothing changes. Cc: Bruno Pr?mont <bonbons@linux-vserver.org> Signed-off-by: Bruno Pr?mont <bonbons@linux-vserver.org> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <redacted> Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <redacted> Acked-by: Lee Jones <redacted> --- Changes in v2: -Use DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED -Change indentation of axp20x_cells initializers to avoid line wrapping Changes in v3: -Improve commit message -Add Bruno's S-o-b --- drivers/mfd/axp20x.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)Applied, thanks.Great, but I'm not seeing this in: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/lee/mfd.git/log/?h=for-mfd-next
Well it does usually take me a day or two push my local branch out, however in this case I had actually dropped a ball somewhere. I've been through my backlog of 'applied' patches and these two are the only ones I failed to pick. I have now, re-picked, re-applied and pushed the branch out. Let me know if something is still not right. Sorry for the inconvenience.
quoted
quoted
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/axp20x.c b/drivers/mfd/axp20x.c index d9f2f96..3f576b7 100644 --- a/drivers/mfd/axp20x.c +++ b/drivers/mfd/axp20x.c@@ -140,6 +140,13 @@ static struct resource axp20x_pek_resources[] = { }, }; +static struct resource axp20x_usb_power_supply_resources[] = { + DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(AXP20X_IRQ_VBUS_PLUGIN, "VBUS_PLUGIN"), + DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(AXP20X_IRQ_VBUS_REMOVAL, "VBUS_REMOVAL"), + DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(AXP20X_IRQ_VBUS_VALID, "VBUS_VALID"), + DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(AXP20X_IRQ_VBUS_NOT_VALID, "VBUS_NOT_VALID"), +}; + static struct resource axp22x_pek_resources[] = { { .name = "PEK_DBR",@@ -432,11 +439,16 @@ static const struct regmap_irq_chip axp288_regmap_irq_chip = { static struct mfd_cell axp20x_cells[] = { { - .name = "axp20x-pek", - .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(axp20x_pek_resources), - .resources = axp20x_pek_resources, + .name = "axp20x-pek", + .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(axp20x_pek_resources), + .resources = axp20x_pek_resources, }, { - .name = "axp20x-regulator", + .name = "axp20x-regulator", + }, { + .name = "axp20x-usb-power-supply", + .of_compatible = "x-powers,axp202-usb-power-supply", + .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(axp20x_usb_power_supply_resources), + .resources = axp20x_usb_power_supply_resources, }, };
-- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog