[PATCH v4] pinctrl: mediatek: Implement wake handler and suspend resume
From: Hongzhou Yang <hidden>
Date: 2015-08-17 21:45:56
Also in:
linux-gpio, linux-mediatek, lkml
On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 21:25 +0800, Yingjoe Chen wrote:
On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 17:09 +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:quoted
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Yingjoe Chen [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Fri, 2015-08-14 at 16:38 +0800, maoguang.meng at mediatek.com wrote:quoted
From: Maoguang Meng <redacted> This patch implement irq_set_wake to get who is wakeup source and setup on suspend resume. Signed-off-by: Maoguang Meng <redacted> --- changes since v3: -add a comment in mtk_eint_chip_read_mask. -delete ALIGN when allocate eint_offsets.ports. -fix unrelated change. changes since v2: -modify irq_wake to handle irq wakeup source. -allocate two buffers separately. -fix some codestyle. Changes since v1: -implement irq_wake handler. --- drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mt8173.c | 1 + drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common.c | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++- drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common.h | 4 ++ 3 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mt8173.c b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mt8173.c index d0c811d..ad27184 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mt8173.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mt8173.c@@ -385,6 +385,7 @@ static struct platform_driver mtk_pinctrl_driver = { .driver = { .name = "mediatek-mt8173-pinctrl", .of_match_table = mt8173_pctrl_match, + .pm = &mtk_eint_pm_ops, }, };diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common.c b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common.c index ad1ea16..fe34ce9 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common.c@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ #include <linux/mfd/syscon.h> #include <linux/delay.h> #include <linux/interrupt.h> +#include <linux/pm.h> #include <dt-bindings/pinctrl/mt65xx.h> #include "../core.h"@@ -1062,6 +1063,77 @@ static int mtk_eint_set_type(struct irq_data *d, return 0; } +static int mtk_eint_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int on) +{ + struct mtk_pinctrl *pctl = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d); + int shift = d->hwirq & 0x1f; + int reg = d->hwirq >> 5; + + if (on) + pctl->wake_mask[reg] |= BIT(shift); + else + pctl->wake_mask[reg] &= ~BIT(shift); + + return 0; +}Hi Maoguang, You changed from set_bit/clear_bit to this, but didn't add any locking. Since this is basic read/modify/write, is it OK to do it without locking?I believe calling .irq_set_wake() concurrently with itself is protected by irq_get_desc_buslock(): int irq_set_irq_wake(unsigned int irq, unsigned int on) { unsigned long flags; struct irq_desc *desc = irq_get_desc_buslock(irq, &flags, IRQ_GET_DESC_CHECK_GLOBAL); int ret = 0; ... ret = set_irq_wake_real(irq, on); ... irq_put_desc_busunlock(desc, flags); return ret; }Hi Dan, You are right, irq_get_desc_buslock will acquire desc lock even when irq_chip didn't provide irq_bus_lock callback. So this should be OK. Sorry for the noise. For this patch: Acked-by: Yingjoe Chen <redacted> Joe.C
Acked-by: Hongzhou Yang <redacted> Thanks. Hongzhou