[PATCH] arm: rpi: Device tree modifications for U-Boot
From: Stephen Warren <hidden>
Date: 2015-08-15 03:46:20
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-tegra, lkml
On 08/12/2015 07:21 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Lucas, On 11 August 2015 at 11:05, Lucas Stach [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Hi Simon, why did you send this to the Tegra ML? Am Dienstag, den 11.08.2015, 08:25 -0600 schrieb Simon Glass:quoted
This updates the device tree from the kernel version to something suitable for U-Boot: - Add stdout-path alias for console - Mark the /soc node to be available pre-relocation so that the early serial console works (we need the 'ranges' property to be available) Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> --- arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835.dtsi | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835.dtsi index 301c73f..bd6bff6 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835.dtsi@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ chosen { bootargs = "earlyprintk console=ttyAMA0"; + stdout-path = &uart; }; soc {@@ -16,6 +17,7 @@ #size-cells = <1>; ranges = <0x7e000000 0x20000000 0x02000000>; dma-ranges = <0x40000000 0x00000000 0x20000000>; + u-boot,dm-pre-reloc;Why do you need this and why should upstream carry your favourite bootloaders configuration? This is in no way hardware description.I'm not sure how much you know about U-Boot, so let me know if you need more info. U-Boot normally starts up by setting up its serial UART and displaying a banner message. At this stage typically only a few devices are initialised (e.g. maybe just the UART). It then relocates itself to the top of memory and starts up all the devices. It throws away any previous devices that it set up before relocation and starts again. U-Boot uses a thing called driver model (dm) which handles driver binding and probing. Driver model has the device tree and would normally scan through it and create devices for everything it finds. Before relocation we don't need every device. Also the CPU is often running slowly, perhaps without the cache enabled. SDRAM may not be available yet so space is short. We want to avoid starting up things that will not be used. So this property indicates that the device is needed before relocation and should be set up by driver model. We need it to avoid a very slow and memory-hungry startup. As to why upstream should accept it, my understanding of upstream is that people can send patches to it and in fact are encouraged to do so, to avoid misunderstandings and duplication. The device tree files are stored in Linux so any binding or source file changes should end up there. Otherwise the files tend to diverge and we end up with multiple bindings and multiple versions of the same source file.
On many platforms, we have U-Boot SPL running first, then the main U-Boot. The main U-Boot binary contains both the code to do the relocation and the binary that runs after relocation. It seems like it'd be simpler to split these up into 3 binaries that each do a single job: 1) SPL, roughly as-is today (varying jobs depending on platform) 2) Relocator, which does nothing but work out where to copy U-Boot, memcpy()s it there, relocates the image (if not PIE), and jumps to it. 3) The main U-Boot. Item (2) above should be simple enough that it can use a very simple debug mechanism rather like DEBUG_LL in the Linux kernel. Similar to what Rob mentioned in his email. Item (3) could use DM and DT/ACPI/... to get device information in a complete non-hard-coded manner.