Thread (3 messages) 3 messages, 2 authors, 2015-08-13

[PATCH v2 0/3] Have Tegra's GPIO chip depend explicitly on the pinctrl device

From: Thierry Reding <hidden>
Date: 2015-08-13 14:34:42
Also in: linux-devicetree, linux-gpio, linux-tegra, lkml

On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 10:29:53AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
Hello,

these three patches make sure that there's an explicit dependency from
the GPIO chip in Tegra SoCs to the corresponding pinctrl device, without
having duplicated gpio ranges.

By having an explicit dependency, we can do things such as probing the
pinctrl device before the GPIO chip device to avoid deferred probes.

Thanks,

Tomeu

Changes in v2:
- Don't defer probe if the pinctrl node is disabled
- Remove outdated comment from the commit changelog

Tomeu Vizoso (3):
  gpio: defer probe if pinctrl cannot be found
  pinctrl: tegra: Only set the gpio range if needed
  ARM: tegra: Add gpio-ranges property
Patches 2 and 3 applied to the Tegra tree. Linus, I've applied the
pinctrl patch to a separate branch, so we could use that to resolve
conflicts, should there be any.

Thierry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20150813/d6be596e/attachment.sig>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help