[PATCH v4 0/6] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for Exynos4x12 platform
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <hidden>
Date: 2015-08-07 04:14:05
Also in:
linux-clk, linux-pm, linux-samsung-soc, lkml
On 07.08.2015 12:51, Viresh Kumar wrote:
Fixed Olof's email id.. On 07-08-15, 09:20, Viresh Kumar wrote:quoted
Cc'ing Rafael again. Guys please don't miss him for any PM related stuff or use get_maintainers .. Cc'ing Arnd/Olof as well to discuss the merge stuff.. On 07-08-15, 08:53, Kukjin Kim wrote:quoted
quoted
Depends on: - next-20150806 branch of linux-next kernel tree - "[PATCH V3 00/16] OPP: Add code to support operating-points-v2 bindings" (http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg435408.html)BTW, hmm...how can we see this series in v4.3?...to be honest, I don't think it can be done in v4.3 because of dependencies with PM / OPP seriesThat is merged by Rafael Yesterday. That is manageable
Indeed, happy to hear it! So the patchset has no external dependencies.
quoted
quoted
and previous exynos CPU OPP series in each cross trees...maybe that's why you created based on linux-next...any idea?So there is no build dependency with OPP patches I hope, as its all about using the bindings defined by them. And so you don't need to depend on that. You might have to rebase on the ARM tree to manage your conflicts. In this case you can rebase directly on ARM SoC branch which has your patches (rebase directly over the last patch instead of the whole branch) and make sure Olof knows about this and he doesn't update (i.e. rebase) his branch, which he might not anyway. The whole idea is to keep a single sha-id for a commit. So you can rebase over the published material present in ARM-SoC ..
Still patches 1/6 and 6/6 need your acks. Is the patch 1/6 a prerequisite for others? It does not look like a prerequisite... but it was put at the beginning of the patchset. Best regards, Krzysztof