Regular oops on shutdown of KVM/ARM64 machines with VGA device
From: Marc Zyngier <hidden>
Date: 2015-07-01 08:20:28
[+Will, Catalin] On 30/06/15 19:50, Christoffer Dall wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 05:20:11PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:quoted
On 30/06/15 17:16, Dirk M?ller wrote:quoted
Hi Marc,quoted
Can try the following patch?[..] Thanks a lot for the quick patch, from a brief testing this seems to fix the issue (on a 4k kernel). I'll retest this in our original configuration (which was 64k) but so far I don't see a reason why it shouldn't fix the issue.Awesome. Mind if I put your Tested-by on the patch?Looks to me like the definition of pmd_huge() on arm64 is broken; pretty sure when I reviewed this original patch I followed the path of both pmd_huge() and pmd_trans_huge() and checked that they don't return true if the entry is clear. This happens to be the case on both arm and x86, and I probably only looked at the arm code and not the arm64 code. I'm fine with this patch, but I think we should also merge the following, since by definition, a clear pmd cannot also be a huge pmd:diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c b/arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c index 2de9d2e..779520b 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ int huge_pmd_unshare(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long *addr, pte_t *ptep) int pmd_huge(pmd_t pmd) { - return !(pmd_val(pmd) & PMD_TABLE_BIT); + return pmd_val(pmd) && !(pmd_val(pmd) & PMD_TABLE_BIT); } int pud_huge(pud_t pud)
If the convention is for pmd_huge to check for pmd_none, then we don't
need my patch, and only this should be merged.
Catalin, Will: your thoughts?
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...