[RFC PATCH v2 1/1] drivers: cpuidle: cpuidle-arm: heterogeneous systems extension

Hi Daniel,

On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 05:52:48AM +0100, Daniel Kurtz wrote:

[...]

quoted

Any further comments ? I can post a v2 with an updated idle_states_cmp()
return value, if we think the multiple drivers approach is valid.

Can you post v2?
From the silence on the list, I guess there is no strong objection to
your approach.

I just wanted to make sure this patch is strictly required before asking
for a merge in the mainline, it adds to the code complexity so it should
not be taken lightly.

So, perhaps it is time to remove the "RFC" as well so this can get on
track to be merged.

I will drop the RFC status and add a simple configuration to define
a config entry to configure the max number of drivers statically so
that we do not waste memory for nothing.

Thanks,
Lorenzo