Hello Myungjoo,

On 07/23/2015 10:30 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:

Hello Chanwoo,

On 07/23/2015 10:19 AM, Chanwoo Choi wrote:

quoted

Hi Javier,

On 07/13/2015 03:58 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:

quoted

The exynos-ppmu driver is only a clock consumer and not a clock
provider but its Device Tree binding listed #clock-cells as an
optional property.

Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <redacted>

---

Documentation/devicetree/bindings/devfreq/event/exynos-ppmu.txt | 1
- 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git
a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/devfreq/event/exynos-ppmu.txt
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/devfreq/event/exynos-ppmu.txt 
index b54bf3a2ff57..aed486692880 100644 ---
a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/devfreq/event/exynos-ppmu.txt 
+++
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/devfreq/event/exynos-ppmu.txt 

@@ -17,7 +17,6 @@ Required properties: Optional properties: -

clock-names : the name of clock used by the PPMU, "ppmu" - clocks :
phandles for clock specified in "clock-names" property --
#clock-cells: should be 1.

Example1 : PPMU nodes in exynos3250.dtsi are listed below.

Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>

+ Devfreq maintainer (Myungjoo Ham)

Thanks for the review and for cc'ing Myungjoo. The get_maintainer.pl script
didn't tell me that so I think Documentation/devicetree/bindings/devfreq/
sub-dir should be added to the DEVICE FREQUENCY (DEVFREQ) entry in the
MAINTAINERS file.

quoted

I think that this patch will be more appropriate on devfreq git tree 
than linux-samsung git tree.

Agreed.

Any comments about this patch?

Best regards,
-- 
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America