[PATCH] drivers/usb/: Simplify return statements
From: Karajgaonkar, Saurabh S. <hidden>
Date: 2015-07-31 05:06:12
Also in:
lkml
From: Karajgaonkar, Saurabh S. <hidden>
Date: 2015-07-31 05:06:12
Also in:
lkml
Sure, I'll do that. Just wanted to know whether I should split the patches and send them in this same mail thread (may be something like [PATCH 01/04 V2]) or should I start new threads and send them separately to the respective maintainers. Thanks and Regards, Saurabh Karajgaonkar On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 11:25:27AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 01:13:42PM +0000, Karajgaonkar, Saurabh (S.) wrote:quoted
From: Saurabh Karajgaonkar <redacted> This patch is created using simple_return.cocci coccinelle script. It replaces the redundant instances where variables are assigned return value from functions and then used in return statements. Signed-off-by: Saurabh Karajgaonkar <redacted>do you mind splitting this per-driver ? That makes it a lot easier for different maintainers to take their part. For example, I would take drivers/usb/phy/* and drivers/usb/musb/* Alan Stern would handle drivers/usb/host/[uoe]hci*.[ch] Mathias Nyman, driver/usb/host/xhci*.[ch] and so on. Thanks -- balbi