Thread (4 messages) 4 messages, 2 authors, 2015-07-31

[PATCH] drivers/usb/: Simplify return statements

From: Karajgaonkar, Saurabh S. <hidden>
Date: 2015-07-31 05:06:12
Also in: lkml

Sure, I'll do that. Just wanted to know whether I should split the patches and
send them in this same mail thread (may be something like [PATCH 01/04 V2])
or should I start new threads and send them separately to the respective maintainers.

Thanks and Regards,
Saurabh Karajgaonkar

On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 11:25:27AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 01:13:42PM +0000, Karajgaonkar, Saurabh (S.) wrote:
quoted
From: Saurabh Karajgaonkar <redacted>

This patch is created using simple_return.cocci coccinelle script.
It replaces the redundant instances where variables are assigned
return value from functions and then used in return statements.

Signed-off-by: Saurabh Karajgaonkar <redacted>
do you mind splitting this per-driver ? That makes it a lot easier for
different maintainers to take their part. For example, I would take
drivers/usb/phy/* and drivers/usb/musb/*

Alan Stern would handle drivers/usb/host/[uoe]hci*.[ch]

Mathias Nyman, driver/usb/host/xhci*.[ch]

and so on. Thanks

-- 
balbi
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help