[PATCH v7 1/2] irqchip: imx-gpcv2: IMX GPCv2 driver for wakeup sources
From: Shenwei Wang <hidden>
Date: 2015-07-28 14:27:51
Also in:
lkml
-----Original Message----- From: Shawn Guo [mailto:shawnguo at kernel.org] Sent: 2015?7?27? 20:25 To: Wang Shenwei-B38339 Cc: shawn.guo at linaro.org; tglx at linutronix.de; jason at lakedaemon.net; Huang Yongcai-B20788; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/2] irqchip: imx-gpcv2: IMX GPCv2 driver for wakeup sources On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 02:29:59PM -0500, Shenwei Wang wrote:quoted
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-imx-gpcv2.cb/drivers/irqchip/irq-imx-gpcv2.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..3084f16--- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-imx-gpcv2.c@@ -0,0 +1,254 @@ +/* + * Copyright (C) 2015 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. + * + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or +modify + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as + * published by the Free Software Foundation. + */ + +#include <linux/of_address.h> +#include <linux/of_irq.h> +#include <linux/slab.h> +#include <linux/irqchip.h> +#include <linux/syscore_ops.h> + +#include <soc/imx/gpcv2.h> + +#define GPC_MAX_IRQS (IMR_NUM * 32)IMR_NUM is a bit generic and should probably have a proper name space.quoted
+ +#define GPC_IMR1_CORE0 0x30 +#define GPC_IMR1_CORE1 0x40 + +struct imx_gpcv2_irq *gpcv2_irq_instance; + +static int gpcv2_wakeup_source_save(void) { + struct imx_gpcv2_irq *cd;We generally name variables in an abbrev of the types to make them intuitive. I tried hard to map "cd" to "imx_gpcv2_irq" and failed. Can you help me on that?
CD is the abbreviation of chip data which is a member of irq_data.
quoted
+ void __iomem *reg; + int i; + + cd = gpcv2_irq_instance; + if (!cd) + return 0; + + for (i = 0; i < IMR_NUM; i++) { + reg = cd->gpc_base + cd->cpu2wakeup + i * 4; + cd->enabled_irqs[i] = readl_relaxed(reg); + writel_relaxed(cd->wakeup_sources[i], reg); + } + + return 0; +} + +static void gpcv2_wakeup_source_restore(void) { + struct imx_gpcv2_irq *cd; + void __iomem *reg; + int i; + + cd = gpcv2_irq_instance; + if (!cd) + return; + + for (i = 0; i < IMR_NUM; i++) { + reg = cd->gpc_base + cd->cpu2wakeup + i * 4; + writel_relaxed(cd->enabled_irqs[i], reg); + cd->wakeup_sources[i] = ~0; + } +} + +static struct syscore_ops imx_gpcv2_syscore_ops = { + .suspend = gpcv2_wakeup_source_save, + .resume = gpcv2_wakeup_source_restore, +}; + +static int imx_gpcv2_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int +on) { + struct imx_gpcv2_irq *cd = d->chip_data; + unsigned int idx = d->hwirq / 32; + unsigned long flags; + void __iomem *reg; + u32 mask, val; + + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cd->rlock, flags); + reg = cd->gpc_base + cd->cpu2wakeup + idx * 4; + mask = 1 << d->hwirq % 32; + val = cd->wakeup_sources[idx]; + + cd->wakeup_sources[idx] = on ? (val & ~mask) : (val | mask); + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cd->rlock, flags); + + /* + * Do *not* call into the parent, as the GIC doesn't have any + * wake-up facility... + */ + + return 0; +} + + +static void imx_gpcv2_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d) { + struct imx_gpcv2_irq *cd = d->chip_data; + void __iomem *reg; + u32 val; + + raw_spin_lock(&cd->rlock); + reg = cd->gpc_base + cd->cpu2wakeup + d->hwirq / 32 * 4; + val = readl_relaxed(reg); + val &= ~(1 << d->hwirq % 32); + writel_relaxed(val, reg); + raw_spin_unlock(&cd->rlock); + + irq_chip_unmask_parent(d); +} + +static void imx_gpcv2_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d) { + struct imx_gpcv2_irq *cd = d->chip_data; + void __iomem *reg; + u32 val; + + raw_spin_lock(&cd->rlock); + reg = cd->gpc_base + cd->cpu2wakeup + d->hwirq / 32 * 4; + val = readl_relaxed(reg); + val |= 1 << (d->hwirq % 32); + writel_relaxed(val, reg); + raw_spin_unlock(&cd->rlock); + + irq_chip_mask_parent(d); +} + +One new line is enough.quoted
+static struct irq_chip imx_gpcv2_irq_chip = { + .name = "GPCv2", + .irq_eoi = irq_chip_eoi_parent, + .irq_mask = imx_gpcv2_irq_mask, + .irq_unmask = imx_gpcv2_irq_unmask, + .irq_set_wake = imx_gpcv2_irq_set_wake, + .irq_retrigger = irq_chip_retrigger_hierarchy, +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP + .irq_set_affinity = irq_chip_set_affinity_parent, +#endif +}; + +static int imx_gpcv2_domain_xlate(struct irq_domain *domain, + struct device_node *controller, + const u32 *intspec, + unsigned int intsize, + unsigned long *out_hwirq, + unsigned int *out_type) +{ + /* Shouldn't happen, really... */ + if (domain->of_node != controller) + return -EINVAL; + + /* Not GIC compliant */ + if (intsize != 3) + return -EINVAL; + + /* No PPI should point to this domain */ + if (intspec[0] != 0) + return -EINVAL; + + *out_hwirq = intspec[1]; + *out_type = intspec[2]; + return 0; +} + +static int imx_gpcv2_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain, + unsigned int irq, unsigned int nr_irqs, + void *data) +{ + struct of_phandle_args *args = data; + struct of_phandle_args parent_args; + irq_hw_number_t hwirq; + int i; + + /* Not GIC compliant */ + if (args->args_count != 3) + return -EINVAL; + + /* No PPI should point to this domain */ + if (args->args[0] != 0) + return -EINVAL; + + /* Can't deal with this */ + hwirq = args->args[1]; + if (hwirq >= GPC_MAX_IRQS) + return -EINVAL; + + for (i = 0; i < nr_irqs; i++) { + irq_domain_set_hwirq_and_chip(domain, irq + i, hwirq + i, + &imx_gpcv2_irq_chip, domain->host_data); + } + parent_args = *args; + parent_args.np = domain->parent->of_node; + return irq_domain_alloc_irqs_parent(domain, irq, nr_irqs, +&parent_args); } + +static struct irq_domain_ops imx_gpcv2_irq_domain_ops = { + .xlate = imx_gpcv2_domain_xlate, + .alloc = imx_gpcv2_domain_alloc, + .free = irq_domain_free_irqs_common, +}; + + +The new line is used so arbitrary. One is enough.quoted
+static int __init imx_gpcv2_irqchip_init(struct device_node *node, + struct device_node *parent) { + struct irq_domain *parent_domain, *domain; + struct imx_gpcv2_irq *cd; + int i; + + if (!parent) { + pr_err("%s: no parent, giving up\n", node->full_name); + return -ENODEV; + } + + parent_domain = irq_find_host(parent); + if (!parent_domain) { + pr_err("%s: unable to get parent domain\n", node->full_name); + return -ENXIO; + } + + cd = kzalloc(sizeof(struct imx_gpcv2_irq), GFP_KERNEL);A null pointer check is needed before it's used.quoted
+ + cd->gpc_base = of_iomap(node, 0); + if (!cd->gpc_base) { + pr_err("fsl-gpcv2: unable to map gpc registers\n"); + kfree(cd); + return -ENOMEM; + } + + domain = irq_domain_add_hierarchy(parent_domain, 0, GPC_MAX_IRQS, + node, &imx_gpcv2_irq_domain_ops, cd); + if (!domain) { + iounmap(cd->gpc_base); + kfree(cd); + return -ENOMEM; + } + irq_set_default_host(domain); + + /* Initially mask all interrupts */ + for (i = 0; i < IMR_NUM; i++) { + writel_relaxed(~0, cd->gpc_base + GPC_IMR1_CORE0 + i * 4); + writel_relaxed(~0, cd->gpc_base + GPC_IMR1_CORE1 + i * 4); + cd->wakeup_sources[i] = ~0; + } + + /* Let CORE0 as the default CPU to wake up by GPC */ + cd->cpu2wakeup = GPC_IMR1_CORE0; + + gpcv2_irq_instance = cd; + + register_syscore_ops(&imx_gpcv2_syscore_ops); + + return 0; +} + +One is enough.quoted
+IRQCHIP_DECLARE(imx_gpcv2, "fsl,imx7d-gpc", imx_gpcv2_irqchip_init); + +One new line at end of file.quoted
diff --git a/include/soc/imx/gpcv2.h b/include/soc/imx/gpcv2.h newfile mode 100644 index 0000000..7234928--- /dev/null +++ b/include/soc/imx/gpcv2.h@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ +/* + * Copyright (C) 2015 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. + * + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or +modify + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as + * published by the Free Software Foundation. + */ + +#ifndef __SOC_IMX_GPCV2_H__ +#define __SOC_IMX_GPCV2_H__ + +#define IMR_NUM 4 + +struct imx_gpcv2_irq { + struct raw_spinlock rlock; + void __iomem *gpc_base; + u32 wakeup_sources[IMR_NUM]; + u32 enabled_irqs[IMR_NUM]; + u32 cpu2wakeup; +};Please try hard to make it an internal data structure of irqchip driver.quoted
+ +void ca7_cpu_resume(void); +void imx7_suspend(void __iomem *ocram_vbase);Why do these declarations need to be in this header?
Just to resolve the compile errors.
Shawnquoted
+ +#endif /* __SOC_IMX_GPCV2_H__ */ -- 2.5.0.rc2 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel