Thread (18 messages) 18 messages, 4 authors, 2015-07-28

[PATCH v6 1/2] irqchip: imx-gpcv2: IMX GPCv2 driver for wakeup sources

From: Shenwei Wang <hidden>
Date: 2015-07-28 14:24:24
Also in: lkml

-----Original Message-----
From: Shawn Guo [mailto:shawnguo at kernel.org]
Sent: 2015?7?27? 19:48
To: Wang Shenwei-B38339
Cc: jason at lakedaemon.net; Huang Yongcai-B20788;
linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; tglx at linutronix.de; shawn.guo at linaro.org;
linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] irqchip: imx-gpcv2: IMX GPCv2 driver for wakeup
sources

On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 02:50:15PM +0000, Shenwei Wang wrote:
quoted
The following structure is currently used in both drivers. The members
"gpc_base/ wakeup_sources/enabled_irqs" are now shared to PM driver.
And the macro IMR_NUM will be referred by both drivers too.

struct imx_gpcv2_irq {
	spinlock_t lock;
	void __iomem *gpc_base;
So this is the virtual base used by both irqchip and pm driver, and the lock is for
register access protection, right?  If so, we can define gpc as a syscon device,
and access it from both drivers with regmap.
Regmap can be a solution too.
quoted
	u32 wakeup_sources[IMR_NUM];
This should be an irqchip internal data and exported to external users like pm
code with an interface like imx_gpcv2_get_wakeup_sources().
Okay.
quoted
	u32 enabled_irqs[IMR_NUM];
I do not see how this is used in pm driver.
quoted
	u32 cpu2wakeup;
The only use of this in pm driver is to unmask interrupt #32 during initialization.
Why cannot it be done in irqchip driver initialization?
Right. This line should be moved to irqchip driver.

Thanks.
Shenwei 
Shawn
quoted
};
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help