Thread (20 messages) 20 messages, 6 authors, 2015-08-28

[PATCH 0/2 RESEND] power: reset: Add syscon reboot/poweroff device nodes for APM X-Gene platform

From: Loc Ho <hidden>
Date: 2015-07-22 18:10:08
Also in: linux-devicetree, lkml

Hi Olof,,
quoted
quoted
quoted
This patch set adds syscon reboot/poweroff device nodes to support reboot and
poweroff features on X-Gene platform.

Tai Nguyen (2):
  power: reset: Add syscon reboot device node for APM X-Gene platform
  power: reset: Add syscon poweroff device node for APM X-Gene Mustang platform

 arch/arm64/boot/dts/apm/apm-mustang.dts |   12 ++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/apm/apm-storm.dtsi  |   12 ++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+)
Hi,

It's unclear to me what you want to happen to these patches. They are
sent to a long list of to-recipients, one of which is arm at kernel.org. In
general, specify the person you want to take action on the patch in to
with the rest on cc.
Is there an owner for all DT node files? Is that Catalina as he is
owner for ARM64 arch folder?
The ARM64 DT changes get merged through arm-soc, i.e. they get sent to
arm at kernel.org by the platform maintainers and picked up by us from
there (Arnd, Kevin or myself).
quoted
quoted
We generally ask that patches first go to the subarch maintainers,
and they in turn send it on to us (either through a pull request or
by sending the patches to be applied). In the case of X-Gene, there is
no general platform maintainer so we keep getting patches from various
engineers at APM and it's unclear to us what your intentions are.

I'd prefer to see one (to start with) person in charge of these (i.e. one
maintainer from the APM side). Please add that person to the MAINTAINERS
file as well.
Are you suggesting that we have one person to start an GIT with
kernel.org to keep all these misc ack'ed patches for X-Gene (APM) that
don't seems to have an maintainer/home. Then request an pull by you?
Pull requests are convenient for us, but if it's just a patch or two,
sending them directly in email is fine as well.
If there is an chance in pulling this power off/reset patches for
4.2-rc4, can you pull in as patches? Otherwise, we will go the GIT
pull request.
What I want to avoid is a large number of people sending us patches
directly, which is why we ask for platform maintainers to coordinate
and aggregate patches to send on to us. That way we have one person
down the chain that we knows how we want the code delivered, and that
can do a round of reviews before we get it.
We will get an GIT setup up for this and Duc Dang will contact you for
pull request when ready.

-Loc
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help