the discussion on the generic cpu seems to be stuck, is there a possibility to take this patch. so that Thunder has a chance to run some KVM.
Thanks,
Tirumalesh.
On Jun 29, 2015, at 10:11 AM, Marc Zyngier [off-list ref] wrote:
On 29/06/15 18:06, Chalamarla, Tirumalesh wrote:
quoted
quoted
On Jun 29, 2015, at 1:53 AM, Marc Zyngier [off-list ref] wrote:
On 26/06/15 20:51, Tirumalesh Chalamarla wrote:
quoted
In order to allow KVM to run on Thunder implementations, add the
minimal support required.
Signed-off-by: Tirumalesh Chalamarla <redacted>
CCing the KVM/ARM maintainers should be the first course of action.
thanks.
quoted
Also, you may want to try Suzuki's patch instead:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg117703.html
will try with this.
quoted
Constantly adding new CPUs without providing any insight as to how they
should be emulated only brings churn, and not much benefit.
we are not planning(at this point) to emulate Thunder with QEMU/others.
Fair enough. If cross-cpu VM migration is none of your concern, then
Suzuki's patch should be enough.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...