[PATCH v7 0/9] Add simple NVMEM Framework via regmap.
From: Stefan Wahren <hidden>
Date: 2015-07-13 20:11:50
Also in:
linux-api, linux-arm-msm, linux-devicetree, lkml
Hi Srinivas,
Srinivas Kandagatla [off-list ref] hat am 13. Juli 2015 um 21:35 geschrieben: On 13/07/15 19:54, Stefan Wahren wrote:quoted
Hi Srinivas,quoted
[...] Providers APIs: nvmem_register/unregister();How do i get the cell info from the devicetree into the nvmem_config?Not sure what is the real use-case here, But this is how it is supposed to work. cellinfo in nvmem_config is used to pass cell information in non-dt style to the core. The core would parse it and convert into nvmem-cells. Am not sure why would you want to do other way round. Could you explain the real use case here?
my question comes from porting mxs_ocotp to NVMEM framework.
Here is the devicetree part:
ocotp: ocotp at 8002c000 {
compatible = "fsl,imx28-ocotp", "fsl,ocotp";
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <1>;
reg = <0x8002c000 0x2000>;
clocks = <&clks 25>;
read-only;
/* Data cells */
ocotp_customer: costumer at 20 {
reg = <0x20 0x10>;
};
ocotp_rom0: rom0 at 1a0 {
reg = <0x1a0 0x4>;
};
};
After calling nvmem_register() in the provider driver [1] no data cell is
registered. So
i looked at the core code and i thought that retrieving the cell info and put it
into the nvmem_config
is job of the provider driver.
Did i missed something?
[1] -
https://github.com/lategoodbye/fsl_ocotp/commit/7c98e19755b69f761885b0e1ceb2c258a7c47ade
quoted
...quoted
quoted
userspace interface: binary file in /sys/bus/nvmem/devices/*/nvmem ex: hexdump /sys/bus/nvmem/devices/qfprom0/nvmem 0000000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 * 00000a0 db10 2240 0000 e000 0c00 0c00 0000 0c00 0000000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 ... * 0001000Since we're entering userspace the behavior should be clear. How do we treat register gaps? Fill them with zero?nvmem file would read full nvmem size which is passed to it as regmap. So It would dump whatever the provider returns.
Sure, but wouldn't it be nice if different provider behave the same?
--sriniquoted
Best regards Stefan