[PATCH 3/7] dmaengine: st_fdma: Add STMicroelectronics FDMA engine driver support
From: Paul Bolle <hidden>
Date: 2015-07-09 08:18:17
Also in:
linux-devicetree, lkml
On wo, 2015-07-08 at 17:11 +0100, Peter Griffin wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
--- a/drivers/dma/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/dma/Kconfig
+config ST_FDMA + bool "ST FDMA dmaengine support" + depends on ARCH_STI + select DMA_ENGINE + select FW_LOADER + select FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER_FALLBACK + select LIBELF_32 + select DMA_VIRTUAL_CHANNELS + help + Enable support for ST FDMA controller. + It supports 16 independent DMA channels, accepts up to 32 DMA requests + + Say Y here if you have such a chipset. + If unsure, say N.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
--- a/drivers/dma/Makefile +++ b/drivers/dma/Makefile +obj-$(CONFIG_ST_FDMA) += st_fdma.o
ST_FDMA is a bool symbol, so st_fdma.o can only be built-in.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
--- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/dma/st_fdma.c
+#include <linux/module.h>
Needed?
+void *st_fdma_seg_to_mem(struct st_fdma_dev *fdev, u64 da, int len)
static?
+{
+ [...]
+}+static int
+st_fdma_elf_load_segments(struct st_fdma_dev *fdev, const struct
firmware *fw)
+{
+ [...]
+ dst = st_fdma_seg_to_mem(fdev, da, memsz);
+ [...]
+}+static const struct of_device_id st_fdma_match[] = {
+ { .compatible = "st,fdma_mpe31", .data = &fdma_mpe31 },
+ {},
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, st_fdma_match);MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE() is preprocessed away for built-in only code.
+static int __exit st_fdma_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct st_fdma_dev *fdev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+
+ wait_for_completion(&fdev->fw_ack);
+
+ st_fdma_clk_disable(fdev);
+
+ return 0;
+}Since this driver is built-in only this means st_fdma_remove() can never be used, right?
+static struct platform_driver st_fdma_platform_driver = {
+ .driver = {
+ .name = "st-fdma",
+ .of_match_table = st_fdma_match,
+ .pm = ST_FDMA_PM,
+ },
+ .probe = st_fdma_probe,
+ .remove = st_fdma_remove,
+};
+module_platform_driver(st_fdma_platform_driver);So can .remove be dropped? Since v4.2-rc1 there's builtin_platform_driver() for built-in only code.
+bool st_fdma_filter_fn(struct dma_chan *chan, void *param)
+{
+ [...]
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(st_fdma_filter_fn);This series adds no users of this export. I suppose they will be added in another series. Is that correct?
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("STMicroelectronics FDMA engine driver");
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Ludovic.barre [off-list ref]");These macros will, basically, be preprocessed away for built-in only code. Thanks, Paul Bolle