[PATCH v2] clk: exynos4: Fix wrong clock for Exynos4x12 ADC
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <hidden>
Date: 2015-07-06 04:03:47
Also in:
linux-clk, linux-samsung-soc, lkml, stable
2015-06-12 14:46 GMT+09:00 Javier Martinez Canillas [off-list ref]:
Hello Krzysztof, On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 3:53 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
The TSADC gate clock was used in Exynos4x12 DTSI for exynos-adc driver. However TSADC is present only on Exynos4210 so on Trats2 board (with Exynos4412 SoC) the exynos-adc driver could not be probed: ERROR: could not get clock /adc at 126C0000:adc(0) exynos-adc 126c0000.adc: failed getting clock, err = -2 exynos-adc: probe of 126c0000.adc failed with error -2 Instead on Exynos4x12 SoCs the main clock used by Analog to Digital Converter is located in different register and it is named in datasheet as PCLK_ADC. Regardless of the name the purpose of this PCLK_ADC clock is the same as purpose of TSADC from Exynos4210. The patch adds gate clock for Exynos4x12 using the proper register so backward compatibility is preserved. This fixes the probe of exynos-adc driver on Exynos4x12 boards and allows accessing sensors connected to it on Trats2 board (ntc,ncp15wb473 AP and battery thermistors). Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <redacted> Cc: <redacted> Fixes: c63c57433003 ("ARM: dts: Add ADC's dt data to read raw data for exynos4x12") Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/6/11/85 --- Changes since v1: 1. After discussion on LKML this solution was chosen because it smaller, simpler, self-contained (one patch to fix issue) and maintains backward compatibility. Thanks to Javier Martinez Canillas and Tomasz Figa for valuable comments. 2. Dropped patch 2/2 because now it is not needed. The clock id "TSADC" will be used on all Exynos4 boards. 3. Added CC-stable. --- drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)Patch looks good to me. Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <redacted>
Hi Tomasz and Sylwester, Any comments on this version of patch? Tomasz, you gave me comments on previous version. Are their satisfied? Best regards, Krzysztof