Thread (45 messages) 45 messages, 7 authors, 2015-08-05

[PATCH v2 4/9] arm: twr-k70f120m: timer driver for Kinetis SoC

From: Paul Osmialowski <hidden>
Date: 2015-07-01 11:48:24
Also in: linux-clk, linux-devicetree, linux-gpio, linux-serial, lkml

Hi Arnd,

Again, thanks for your remarks. I'm attaching timer patch candidate for 
the third iteration.

Following your advices, I've changed following things:

- not abusing aliases (same goes to pinctrl driver)
- ranges for addressing particular timers (no change in code though, it's
   just up to the .dts implementor)
- *_RD and *_WR macros removed; whole this big-endian issue was a mistake,
   I guess I overdid it a bit trying to make my drivers as universal as
   fsl-edma driver...
- *_SET and *_RESET macros removed - they were giving false sense of
   security hiding potential race.

Any comments are welcome.

On Tue, 30 Jun 2015, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Tuesday 30 June 2015 14:27:25 Paul Osmialowski wrote:
quoted
+Example:
+
+aliases {
+	pit0 = &pit0;
+	pit1 = &pit1;
+	pit2 = &pit2;
+	pit3 = &pit3;
+};
+
+pit at 40037000 {
+	compatible = "fsl,kinetis-pit-timer";
+	reg = <0x40037000 0x100>;
+	clocks = <&mcg_pclk_gate 5 23>;
+	#address-cells = <1>;
+	#size-cells = <1>;
+	ranges;
All the subnodes seem to fall inside of the device's own register
area, so I think it would be nicer to use a specific 'ranges'
property that only translates the registers in question.
quoted
 / {
+	aliases {
+		pit0 = &pit0;
+		pit1 = &pit1;
+		pit2 = &pit2;
+		pit3 = &pit3;
+	};
+
 	soc {
+		pit at 40037000 {
+			compatible = "fsl,kinetis-pit-timer";
+			reg = <0x40037000 0x100>;
+			clocks = <&mcg_pclk_gate 5 23>;
+			#address-cells = <1>;
+			#size-cells = <1>;
+			ranges;
+
+			pit0: timer at 40037100 {
+				reg = <0x40037100 0x10>;
+				interrupts = <68>;
+				status = "disabled";
+			};
I don't think it's necessary to have both an alias
and a label here. What do you use the alias for?
quoted
+
+#define KINETIS_PITMCR_PTR(base, reg) \
+	(&(((struct kinetis_pit_mcr_regs *)(base))->reg))
+#define KINETIS_PITMCR_RD(be, base, reg) \
+		((be) ? ioread32be(KINETIS_PITMCR_PTR(base, reg)) \
+		      : ioread32(KINETIS_PITMCR_PTR(base, reg)))
+#define KINETIS_PITMCR_WR(be, base, reg, val) do { \
+		if (be) \
+			iowrite32be((val), KINETIS_PITMCR_PTR(base, reg)); \
+		else \
+			iowrite32((val), KINETIS_PITMCR_PTR(base, reg)); \
+	} while (0)
These should really be written as inline functions. Can you
explain why you need to deal with a big-endian version of this
hardware? Can you configure the endianess of this register block
and just set it to one of the two at boot time?
quoted
+#define KINETIS_PIT_PTR(base, reg) \
+	(&(((struct kinetis_pit_channel_regs *)(base))->reg))
+#define KINETIS_PIT_RD(be, base, reg) \
+		((be) ? ioread32be(KINETIS_PIT_PTR(base, reg)) \
+		      : ioread32(KINETIS_PIT_PTR(base, reg)))
+#define KINETIS_PIT_WR(be, base, reg, val) do { \
+		if (be) \
+			iowrite32be((val), KINETIS_PIT_PTR(base, reg)); \
+		else \
+			iowrite32((val), KINETIS_PIT_PTR(base, reg)); \
+	} while (0)
+#define KINETIS_PIT_SET(be, base, reg, mask) \
+		KINETIS_PIT_WR(be, base, reg, \
+			KINETIS_PIT_RD(be, base, reg) | (mask))
+#define KINETIS_PIT_RESET(be, base, reg, mask) \
+		KINETIS_PIT_WR(be, base, reg, \
+			KINETIS_PIT_RD(be, base, reg) & (~(mask)))

Functions again. Also, just pass a pointer to your own data structure
into the function, instead of the 'be' and 'base' values.

The 'set' and 'reset' functions look like they need a spinlock
to avoid races.

	Arnd
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0004-arm-twr-k70f120m-timer-driver-for-Kinetis-SoC.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 12866 bytes
Desc: 
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20150701/0a4754cf/attachment-0001.bin>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help