[PATCH v2 4/9] arm: twr-k70f120m: timer driver for Kinetis SoC
From: Paul Osmialowski <hidden>
Date: 2015-07-01 11:48:24
Also in:
linux-clk, linux-devicetree, linux-gpio, linux-serial, lkml
Hi Arnd, Again, thanks for your remarks. I'm attaching timer patch candidate for the third iteration. Following your advices, I've changed following things: - not abusing aliases (same goes to pinctrl driver) - ranges for addressing particular timers (no change in code though, it's just up to the .dts implementor) - *_RD and *_WR macros removed; whole this big-endian issue was a mistake, I guess I overdid it a bit trying to make my drivers as universal as fsl-edma driver... - *_SET and *_RESET macros removed - they were giving false sense of security hiding potential race. Any comments are welcome. On Tue, 30 Jun 2015, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Tuesday 30 June 2015 14:27:25 Paul Osmialowski wrote:quoted
+Example: + +aliases { + pit0 = &pit0; + pit1 = &pit1; + pit2 = &pit2; + pit3 = &pit3; +}; + +pit at 40037000 { + compatible = "fsl,kinetis-pit-timer"; + reg = <0x40037000 0x100>; + clocks = <&mcg_pclk_gate 5 23>; + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <1>; + ranges;All the subnodes seem to fall inside of the device's own register area, so I think it would be nicer to use a specific 'ranges' property that only translates the registers in question.quoted
/ { + aliases { + pit0 = &pit0; + pit1 = &pit1; + pit2 = &pit2; + pit3 = &pit3; + }; + soc { + pit at 40037000 { + compatible = "fsl,kinetis-pit-timer"; + reg = <0x40037000 0x100>; + clocks = <&mcg_pclk_gate 5 23>; + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <1>; + ranges; + + pit0: timer at 40037100 { + reg = <0x40037100 0x10>; + interrupts = <68>; + status = "disabled"; + };I don't think it's necessary to have both an alias and a label here. What do you use the alias for?quoted
+ +#define KINETIS_PITMCR_PTR(base, reg) \ + (&(((struct kinetis_pit_mcr_regs *)(base))->reg)) +#define KINETIS_PITMCR_RD(be, base, reg) \ + ((be) ? ioread32be(KINETIS_PITMCR_PTR(base, reg)) \ + : ioread32(KINETIS_PITMCR_PTR(base, reg))) +#define KINETIS_PITMCR_WR(be, base, reg, val) do { \ + if (be) \ + iowrite32be((val), KINETIS_PITMCR_PTR(base, reg)); \ + else \ + iowrite32((val), KINETIS_PITMCR_PTR(base, reg)); \ + } while (0)These should really be written as inline functions. Can you explain why you need to deal with a big-endian version of this hardware? Can you configure the endianess of this register block and just set it to one of the two at boot time?quoted
+#define KINETIS_PIT_PTR(base, reg) \ + (&(((struct kinetis_pit_channel_regs *)(base))->reg)) +#define KINETIS_PIT_RD(be, base, reg) \ + ((be) ? ioread32be(KINETIS_PIT_PTR(base, reg)) \ + : ioread32(KINETIS_PIT_PTR(base, reg))) +#define KINETIS_PIT_WR(be, base, reg, val) do { \ + if (be) \ + iowrite32be((val), KINETIS_PIT_PTR(base, reg)); \ + else \ + iowrite32((val), KINETIS_PIT_PTR(base, reg)); \ + } while (0) +#define KINETIS_PIT_SET(be, base, reg, mask) \ + KINETIS_PIT_WR(be, base, reg, \ + KINETIS_PIT_RD(be, base, reg) | (mask)) +#define KINETIS_PIT_RESET(be, base, reg, mask) \ + KINETIS_PIT_WR(be, base, reg, \ + KINETIS_PIT_RD(be, base, reg) & (~(mask)))Functions again. Also, just pass a pointer to your own data structure into the function, instead of the 'be' and 'base' values. The 'set' and 'reset' functions look like they need a spinlock to avoid races. Arnd
-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 0004-arm-twr-k70f120m-timer-driver-for-Kinetis-SoC.patch Type: text/x-diff Size: 12866 bytes Desc: URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20150701/0a4754cf/attachment-0001.bin>