On 2015/6/30 1:35, Will Deacon wrote:
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 09:33:03AM +0100, Zhen Lei wrote:
quoted
Because we will choose the minimum value between STRTAB_L1_SZ_SHIFT and
IDR1.SIDSIZE, so enlarge STRTAB_L1_SZ_SHIFT will not impact the platforms
whose IDR1.SIDSIZE is smaller than old STRTAB_L1_SZ_SHIFT value.
Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <redacted>
---
drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
index 87c3d9b..d799feb 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
@@ -206,7 +206,7 @@
* Linear: Enough to cover 1 << IDR1.SIDSIZE entries
* 2lvl: 8k L1 entries, 256 lazy entries per table (each table covers a PCI bus)
*/
-#define STRTAB_L1_SZ_SHIFT 16
+#define STRTAB_L1_SZ_SHIFT 20
#define STRTAB_SPLIT 8
#define STRTAB_L1_DESC_DWORDS 1
Can you update the comment too, please, to say that we now have 128k entries
at level 1?
OK, no problem.
Will
.