Thread (25 messages) flat view 25 messages, 3 authors, 2015-07-01
STALE4099d

[PATCH 7/8] iommu/arm-smmu: enlarge STRTAB_L1_SZ_SHIFT to support larger sidsize

From: leizhen <hidden>
Date: 2015-06-30 08:57:33
Also in: linux-iommu

On 2015/6/30 1:35, Will Deacon wrote:
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 09:33:03AM +0100, Zhen Lei wrote:
quoted
Because we will choose the minimum value between STRTAB_L1_SZ_SHIFT and
IDR1.SIDSIZE, so enlarge STRTAB_L1_SZ_SHIFT will not impact the platforms
whose IDR1.SIDSIZE is smaller than old STRTAB_L1_SZ_SHIFT value.

Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <redacted>
---
 drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
index 87c3d9b..d799feb 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
@@ -206,7 +206,7 @@
  * Linear: Enough to cover 1 << IDR1.SIDSIZE entries
  * 2lvl: 8k L1 entries, 256 lazy entries per table (each table covers a PCI bus)
  */
-#define STRTAB_L1_SZ_SHIFT		16
+#define STRTAB_L1_SZ_SHIFT		20
 #define STRTAB_SPLIT			8

 #define STRTAB_L1_DESC_DWORDS		1
Can you update the comment too, please, to say that we now have 128k entries
at level 1?
OK, no problem.
Will

.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help