[PATCH] XOR implementation for ARMv8

On 24 June 2015 at 10:29, J?r?me Forissier [off-list ref] wrote:

On 06/24/2015 09:00 AM, ??? wrote:

quoted

Use the 128-bit SIMD registers and SIMD arithmetic instructions for XOR calculation in assembly language.

Don't you need kernel_neon_begin()/kernel_neon_end() somewhere? (see
Documentation/arm/kernel_mode_neon.txt).

Jerome is right: use of this driver will corrupt the FP/SIMD state of
arbitrary userland tasks if you don't explicitly claim the NEON for
in-kernel use by calling kernel_neon_begin)_ and end()

Since XOR may be called in interrupt context, this could add a fixed
overhead to each call, even if you are calling the function many times
in a row. This means you may be better off using even fewer registers,
and use kernel_neon_begin_partial() instead.

May I ask what kind of core you tested this on?

-- 
Ard.