OMAP baseline test results for v4.1-rc5
From: Tero Kristo <hidden>
Date: 2015-06-01 15:29:49
Also in:
linux-omap
On 06/01/2015 08:49 AM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
+ Tero Hello Jeroen, On Mon, 1 Jun 2015, Jeroen Hofstee wrote:quoted
On 30-05-15 17:56, Jeroen Hofstee wrote:quoted
Hello Paul, On 30-05-15 17:50, Paul Walmsley wrote:quoted
Here are some basic OMAP test results for Linux v4.1-rc5. Logs and other details at: http://www.pwsan.com/omap/testlogs/test_v4.1-rc5/20150529162206/The cmt3517 seems to have these some In-Band errors. Do you happen to know where these are coming from?git bisect + some workarounds seem to indicate: d744ce37b721d6678f420ba0fb058f615eb015b6 is the first bad commit commit d744ce37b721d6678f420ba0fb058f615eb015b6 Author: Tero Kristo [off-list ref] Date: Tue Feb 24 16:22:45 2015 +0200 ARM: dts: omap3: add minimal l4 bus layout with control module support This patch creates an l4_core interconnect for OMAP3, and moves some of the generic peripherals under it. System control module nodes are moved under this new interconnect also, and the SCM clock layout is changed to use the renamed SCM node as the clock provider. Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo [off-list ref] Reported-by: Tony Lindgren [off-list ref] I haven't looked further into it yet,Interesting; thanks for the bisect. In the mainline kernel, this appears to be commit b8845074cfbbd1d1b46720a1b563d7b4240dac21. I took a quick look at the control module offsets in that patch, and they appear to match what's in the SPRUGR0B PDF. Will try a few test boots here to confirm your findings. Tero, care to take a look?
Yes, seems I have introduced a bug with this patch on am35xx only. I missed updating part of the am35xx related dts files. Will post a fix in a bit. -Tero