[PATCH 1/8] of/fdt: split off FDT self reservation from memreserve processing
From: Ard Biesheuvel <hidden>
Date: 2015-06-01 07:56:07
(snip non-LAKML CCs) On 22 May 2015 at 12:35, Catalin Marinas [off-list ref] wrote:
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 08:41:53AM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:quoted
This splits off the reservation of the memory occupied by the FDT binary itself from the processing of the memory reservations it contains. This is necessary because the physical address of the FDT, which is needed to perform the reservation, may not be known to the FDT driver core, i.e., it may be mapped outside the linear direct mapping, in which case __pa() returns a bogus value. Cc: Russell King <redacted> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <redacted> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <redacted>For the arm64 part: Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Thanks Catalin, Since there has been virtually no discussion about these patches, I guess they have missed the window for being considered for inclusion in v4.2 May I suggest that you at least consider these patches regarding the ID map http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/411720 http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/411721 since they are self-contained and the first one does fix a potential problem where the Image placement logic in the stub does not take the 512 MB alignment boundary into account. The second one is a trivial cleanup. Perhaps Mark can comment on the desirability to include the FDT remapping patch (which depends on this 1/8). http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.efi/5738 I don't have strong preference either way, although it would be good to get some patches off my personal queue. Regards, Ard.