Thread (2 messages) 2 messages, 2 authors, 2015-06-17

[PATCH 5/5] ARM64: MediaTek MT8173: Add SCPSYS device node

From: s.hauer@pengutronix.de (Sascha Hauer)
Date: 2015-06-17 07:56:57
Also in: linux-devicetree, linux-mediatek, lkml

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 11:17:53AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Sascha Hauer [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
This adds the SCPSYS device node to the MT8173 dtsi file.

Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi | 10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi
index 924fdb6..12430f0 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi
@@ -125,6 +125,16 @@
 						<GIC_SPI 147 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
 		};
 
+		scpsys: scpsys at 10006000 {
+			compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-scpsys";
+			#power-domain-cells = <1>;
+			reg = <0 0x10006000 0 0x1000>;
+			clocks = <&clk26m>,
+				 <&topckgen CLK_TOP_MM_SEL>;
Neither your binding doc (nor the generic one) mentions these clock
properties or what they are used for.  They appear to define a clock
that must be enabled in order to for the power domain to be on.
Ok, will add documentation for this.
Also the order here seems rather important and probably needs
documenting in the binding (e.g. the clk_id order is hard-coded in the
driver.)
The order is not important, the clock-names property defines which clock
is which.

Sascha

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help