[RESEND PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: zynq: fix offset address for {SD0, SD1}_WP_CD_SEL

[RESEND PATCH 0/2] pinctrl: zynq: fix two bugs of zynq pinmux function · Masahiro Yamada <hidden> · 2015-05-20
[RESEND PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: zynq: fix DEFINE_ZYNQ_PINMUX_FUNCTION_MUX macro · Masahiro Yamada <hidden> · 2015-05-20
Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: zynq: fix DEFINE_ZYNQ_PINMUX_FUNCTION_MUX macro · Linus Walleij <hidden> · 2015-06-01
[RESEND PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: zynq: fix offset address for {SD0,SD1}_WP_CD_SEL · Masahiro Yamada <hidden> · 2015-05-20
Re: [RESEND PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: zynq: fix offset address for {SD0,SD1}_WP_CD_SEL · Linus Walleij <hidden> · 2015-06-01
Re: [RESEND PATCH 0/2] pinctrl: zynq: fix two bugs of zynq pinmux function · Sören Brinkmann <hidden> · 2015-05-20
Re: [RESEND PATCH 0/2] pinctrl: zynq: fix two bugs of zynq pinmux function · Masahiro Yamada <hidden> · 2015-05-21
Re: [RESEND PATCH 0/2] pinctrl: zynq: fix two bugs of zynq pinmux function · Linus Walleij <hidden> · 2015-06-01

From: Linus Walleij <hidden>
Date: 2015-06-01 12:44:42
Also in: linux-gpio, lkml

On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Masahiro Yamada
[off-list ref] wrote:

The address for SD0_WP_CD_SEL, SD1_WP_CD_SEL is 0xf8000830,
0xf8000834, respectively.

Each offset address must be prefixed with 0x.

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <redacted>

No reply from S?ren, but applying anyway since it seems to make sense.
Only for -next though.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help