Thread (24 messages) 24 messages, 13 authors, 2015-07-12
STALE4023d

[PATCH] ARM: v7 setup function should invalidate L1 cache

From: Russell King - ARM Linux <hidden>
Date: 2015-05-19 22:07:21
Also in: linux-rockchip, linux-sh, linux-tegra

On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 11:55:12PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Tuesday 19 May 2015 23:44:58 Heiko Stuebner wrote:
quoted
Michael Niewoehner tested this on a rk3188 (Cortex-A9) and wrote in [0]
quoted
Tested-by: Michael Niewoehner <redacted>

Tested on Radxa Rock Pro with RK3188.
The kernel panics on reboot I had before and also a kernel BUG when running
"memtester 1900M" went away and the rock seems to run stable now.
We should probably create a separate fix for that and add it to the stable
kernels then. I would suggest something like the untested patch below,
which takes advantage of the fact that we already have separate assignments
for the start_secondary function pointer for A9 and A17.
Your patch is also continuing the pattern with this code...
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/headsmp.S b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/headsmp.S
index 46c22dedf632..ae0077e8fe98 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/headsmp.S
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/headsmp.S
@@ -16,9 +16,6 @@
 #include <linux/init.h>
 
 ENTRY(rockchip_secondary_startup)
-	mrc	p15, 0, r0, c0, c0, 0	@ read main ID register
-	ldr	r1, =0x00000c09		@ Cortex-A9 primary part number
-	teq	r0, r1
 	beq	v7_invalidate_l1
 	b	secondary_startup
If you look carefully at this, you'll notice that it's utter crap.
(Sorry, but it is.)  It has two problems:

1. It'll never match a Cortex-A9 CPU.  Cortex-A9 has a MIDR value of
   0x412fc09a, not 0x00000c09.  The bit position of the part number
   field isn't even right.

2. If it does match, then we branch to "v7_invalidate_l1" without setting
   the link register: we'll never return back here (we'll return to whatever
   random value the link register contains) and so we'll never make it to
   secondary_startup.  *Thankfully*, because of (1), this branch will
   never be taken - this is it's saving grace.

Your patch introduces a /third/ form of crapiness:

3. If the PSR happens to have Z=1, the "beq" instruction will be taken,
   thereby crashing the system because of (2).

The /simplest/ change which would fix this problem is to just change
proc-v7.S.  The remainder is effectively a cleanup removing redundant
code.

-- 
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help