Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2015-05-27

[RFC PATCH] EDAC: Cleanup atomic_scrub mess

From: bp@alien8.de (Borislav Petkov)
Date: 2015-05-27 15:52:19
Also in: linux-devicetree

On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 04:13:22PM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
On 05/21/2015 02:11 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
quoted
From: Borislav Petkov<redacted>

So first of all, this atomic_scrub() function's naming is bad. It looks
like an atomic_t helper. Change it to edac_atomic_scrub().

The bigger problem is that this function is arch-specific and every new
arch which doesn't necessarily need that functionality still needs to
define it, otherwise EDAC doesn't compile.

So instead of doing that and including arch-specific headers, have each
arch define an EDAC_ATOMIC_SCRUB symbol which can be used in edac_mc.c
for ifdeffery. Much cleaner.

We already are doing this with another symbol - EDAC_SUPPORT. This is
also much cleaner than having CONFIG_EDAC explicitly depend on all the
arches which need/have EDAC support and drivers.

This way I can kill the useless edac.h header in tile too.

Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov<redacted>
Acked-by: Chris Metcalf <redacted> [for tile]
Thanks.

Just to clarify after today's discussion on IRC: this patch doesn't
change current DRAM scrubbing behavior on the relevant arches - it
simply makes the definition of that atomic_scrub thing non-mandatory on
new arches or on those which don't need it.

In the meantime, patch has been build-tested on arm and ppc - the two
I'm missing an ACK for.

:-)

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help