Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2015-05-13

[PATCH 3/6] arm64: tegra: Add Tegra210 support

From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)
Date: 2015-05-13 17:11:15
Also in: linux-devicetree, linux-tegra

On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 04:57:42PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
quoted hunk
From: Thierry Reding <redacted>

NVIDIA Tegra210 (also known as Tegra X1) has four Cortex-A57 and four
Cortex-A53 CPUs. Compared to Tegra124 and Tegra132 it comes with a 256-
core Maxwell GPU. It supports processing videos of up to 4K resolutions
at 60 fps (H.265, VP9, H.264).

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <redacted>
---
 arch/arm64/Kconfig                       |   9 +
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra210.dtsi | 998 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 1007 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra210.dtsi
diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
index 7796af4b1d6f..bfdf064ada66 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
@@ -225,6 +225,15 @@ config ARCH_TEGRA_132_SOC
 	  but contains an NVIDIA Denver CPU complex in place of
 	  Tegra124's "4+1" Cortex-A15 CPU complex.
 
+config ARCH_TEGRA_210_SOC
+	bool "NVIDIA Tegra210 SoC"
+	depends on ARCH_TEGRA
+	select PINCTRL_TEGRA210
+	select USB_ULPI if USB_PHY
+	select USB_ULPI_VIEWPORT if USB_PHY
+	help
+	  Enable support for the NVIDIA Tegra210 SoC.
+
The previous ARCH_TEGRA_132_SOC escaped me. Do we need all these
ARCH_TEGRA_*_SOC entries? Can we not have per-driver Kconfig options?
For example, ARCH_TEGRA_132_SOC seems to be only used in
drivers/clk/tegra, a specific Kconfig entry in there would suffice.

-- 
Catalin
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help