Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2015-05-11

Master-aware devices and sideband ID data

From: Will Deacon <hidden>
Date: 2015-05-11 09:52:36
Also in: linux-devicetree, linux-iommu

On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 08:30:00PM +0100, Stuart Yoder wrote:
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Will Deacon [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 06:49:32PM +0100, Stuart Yoder wrote:
quoted
The FSL LS2085A SoC has an actual RID->SID mapping table in the PCI
controller, but it is not static in the sense of fixed in hardware or
firmware.  It's
a programmable mapping table, and we envision Linux programming this table.
Ok, so I assume you're not planning to use ACPI with this system?
Not initially, but perhaps in the future.  I guess I don't know the implications
to ACPI yet.
Well, I suggest you take a look at the IORT spec[1] asap, because I don't think
it can describe your system if you want to go in the direction of dynamic
mappings.
quoted
Also, we can't just program this table willy-nilly, as I'm sure you're
aware. For example, updating a the SMRs in a live SMMU is a big no-no,
so although Linux may initialise the table, it can only be safely changed
at device init/teardown time, surely?
Correct.  That would not be updated when a device is live.
Ok, so the best way for Linux is probably to abstract this in the bus code
and have that allocate the IDs when a device is `hotplugged' on. This would
also fit well with consolidating the group creation for platform and PCI
devices.

Will

[1] http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.den0049a/DEN0049A_IO_Remapping_Table.pdf
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help