[PATCH 1/3] clk: mux: Add regmap support for simple mux
From: matthias.bgg@gmail.com (Matthias Brugger)
Date: 2015-05-29 15:58:17
Also in:
linux-clk, linux-mediatek, lkml
2015-05-29 8:57 GMT+02:00 Joachim Eastwood [off-list ref]:
Hi Matthias, On 28 May 2015 at 20:41, Matthias Brugger [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Some devices like SoCs from Mediatek need to use the clock muxes through a regmap interface. This patch adds regmap support for simple the simple multiplexer clock code.Nice to see regmap support. This something I would also like to see added to the clk framework. And if the approach is agreed upon I would like to see support on gates and dividers also.
I totally agree.
quoted
+static void clk_mux_writel(struct clk_mux *mux, u32 val) +{ + if (mux->flags && CLK_MUX_USE_REGMAP)Assume you mean &.
Sure, it's just luck that the patch didn't end up with a hanging system when I tested it yesterday. Fixed in next version.
quoted
+ regmap_write(mux->regmap, mux->offset, val); + else + clk_writel(val, mux->reg); +} + +static u32 clk_mux_readl(struct clk_mux *mux) +{ + u32 val; + + if (mux->flags && CLK_MUX_USE_REGMAP)And here.
Ditto.
quoted
+ regmap_read(mux->regmap, mux->offset, &val); + else + val = clk_readl(mux->reg); + + return val; +} +[...]quoted
@@ -409,7 +410,9 @@ void clk_unregister_divider(struct clk *clk); struct clk_mux { struct clk_hw hw;quoted
void __iomem *reg; + struct regmap *regmap;Since it not possible to have both iomem and regmap at the same time. Could this be put in a union or does that make registration more difficult?
It just adds a flag check to the registration. I will add it in the next version. Thanks for reviewing. Matthias -- motzblog.wordpress.com