[RFC 0/4] arm64: add livepatch support

From
Jiri Kosina <hidden>
Date
2015-05-27 06:15:57
Also in
lkml
Reply to
AKASHI Takahiro, 2015-05-27
On Wed, 27 May 2015, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
quoted
quoted
Livepatch was merged in v4.0, and allows replacying a function dynamically
based on ftrace framework, but it also requires -mfentry option of gcc.
Currently arm64 gcc doesn't support it, but by adding a helper function to
ftrace, we will be able to support livepatch on arch's which don't support
this option.

I submit this patchset as RFC since I'm not quite sure that I'm doing
in the right way, or we should definitely support -fentry instead.
I don't have arm64 cross-compiler handy, could you please copy/paste how
does function prologue, generated by gcc -pg on arm64 look like?
As other people said, my current patch has some drawbacks and was far 
from perfect. I talked to a toolchain guy in Linaro, and he suggested 
that, instead of x86 specific -mfentry option, we should add a new 
generic option, -fprolog-pad=N.

It works as if "-pg -mfentry -mrecord-mcount -mnop-mcount" were 
specified on a command line, but actually puts N nop instructions at the 
very beginning of a function. (Please note that -mrecord-mcount and 
-mnop-mcount options have been added in x86 gcc to make it easier to 
implement ftrace and others.)
This is BTW implemented in gcc for various architectures already (see 
-mhotpatch for s390 or -mprofile-kernel for ppc64). Would be nice to at 
least try the semantics and format unified in some sense.

Thanks,

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
Thread (18 messages) 18 messages, 6 authors, last reply 2015-05-28
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread / next series-diff position
kprevious message in thread / previous series-diff position
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help