Thread (11 messages) flat view 11 messages, 2 authors, 2015-05-14

[PATCH 2/2] selftests/breakpoints: only set TEST_PROGS when built

From: Shuah Khan <hidden>
Date: 2015-05-14 15:27:27
Also in: lkml

On 05/14/2015 08:15 AM, Tyler Baker wrote:
On 13 May 2015 at 14:41, Shuah Khan [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On 05/12/2015 03:59 PM, tyler.baker at linaro.org wrote:
quoted
From: Tyler Baker <redacted>

Set TEST_PROGS only when a build has occurred.

Signed-off-by: Tyler Baker <redacted>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/breakpoints/Makefile | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/breakpoints/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/breakpoints/Makefile
index 1822356..54cc3e7 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/breakpoints/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/breakpoints/Makefile
@@ -12,12 +12,11 @@ endif
 all:
 ifeq ($(ARCH),x86)
      gcc breakpoint_test.c -o breakpoint_test
+     TEST_PROGS := breakpoint_test
 else
      echo "Not an x86 target, can't build breakpoints selftests"
 endif

-TEST_PROGS := breakpoint_test
-
 include ../lib.mk

 clean:
Hmm. With this change install fails to copy breakpoint_test all
together. Remember setting TEST_PROGS in compile step makes it
not stick around when install target is called. A better approach
would be the following:

if [ -f breakpoint_test ]
    TEST_PROGS := breakpoint_test
fi
Thanks for pointing this out, this is a good catch. We will also need
to do this for the x86 tests IIRC. Would it make more sense to have
this check performed in the INSTALL_RULE so that we don't have to have
a bunch of IF statements in the various Makefiles?
Right. x86 will need this type of logic for 32-bit execs when they
aren't not built on a 64-bit system, and for 64-bit execs when they
aren't built on a 32-bit system.
Something like...

       @for ARTIFACT in $(TEST_PROGS) $(TEST_PROGS_EXTENDED) $(TEST_FILES); do \
               if [ -f $$ARTIFACT ]; then \
                    install -t $(INSTALL_PATH) $$ARTIFACT; \
               fi; \
       done;
I think it makes perfect sense to do this in INSTALL_RULE.
As you said, this will avoid changes to test individual
Makefiles and new test writers don't have to worry about
adding this.

Would you like make the necessary changes?

thanks,
-- Shuah


-- 
Shuah Khan
Sr. Linux Kernel Developer
Open Source Innovation Group
Samsung Research America (Silicon Valley)
shuahkh at osg.samsung.com | (970) 217-8978
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help