W dniu 13.05.2015 o 18:11, Kukjin Kim pisze:
On 05/11/15 22:42, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
quoted
Usage of labels instead of full paths reduces possible mistakes when
overriding nodes.
In case of this changes, I have no objection.
But I can't see the 'codec' node you deleted in this patch?
It is under label "mfc". This label was already defined in exynos4.dtsi
before:
quoted
+&mfc {
+ samsung,mfc-r = <0x43000000 0x800000>;
+ samsung,mfc-l = <0x51000000 0x800000>;
+ status = "okay";
+};
And if possible, can you please put the labels in alphabetically when
you create this patch again? so that we could find the labels easily...
Yes, when I switched to the "label convention" I put them in
alphabetical order. However I did not re-order other (existing) nodes.
This makes some confusion but I wanted to limit the scope of this change
and do only one thing - switch to "label convention".
Do you want me to reorder alphabetically everything?
Best regards,
Krzysztof