[V3 PATCH 3/5] device property: Introduces device_dma_is_coherent()
From: santosh shilimkar <hidden>
Date: 2015-05-08 20:28:04
Also in:
linux-acpi, linux-crypto, lkml, netdev
On 5/8/2015 1:49 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday, May 07, 2015 09:12:00 PM santosh.shilimkar at oracle.com wrote:quoted
On 5/7/15 5:37 PM, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:quoted
Currently, device drivers, which support both OF and ACPI, need to call two separate APIs, of_dma_is_coherent() and acpi_dma_is_coherent()) to determine device coherency attribute. This patch simplifies this process by introducing a new device property API, device_dma_is_coherent(), which calls the appropriate interface based on the booting architecture. Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> --- drivers/base/property.c | 12 ++++++++++++ include/linux/property.h | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)diff --git a/drivers/base/property.c b/drivers/base/property.c index 1d0b116..8123c6e 100644 --- a/drivers/base/property.c +++ b/drivers/base/property.c@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ #include <linux/export.h> #include <linux/kernel.h> #include <linux/of.h> +#include <linux/of_address.h> #include <linux/property.h> /**@@ -519,3 +520,14 @@ unsigned int device_get_child_node_count(struct device *dev) return count; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_get_child_node_count); + +bool device_dma_is_coherent(struct device *dev) +{ + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) && dev->of_node)Do you really need that IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) ? In other words, dev->of_node should be null for !CONFIG_OFYes, but IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) causes the check to be optimized away by the compiler if CONFIG_OF is not enabled.
Sure but my point was why you need it when just 'dev->of_node' check is enough. May be I missed something. Regards, Santosh