Thread (17 messages) 17 messages, 4 authors, 2015-05-12

[V3 PATCH 3/5] device property: Introduces device_dma_is_coherent()

From: santosh shilimkar <hidden>
Date: 2015-05-08 20:28:04
Also in: linux-acpi, linux-crypto, lkml, netdev

On 5/8/2015 1:49 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday, May 07, 2015 09:12:00 PM santosh.shilimkar at oracle.com wrote:
quoted
On 5/7/15 5:37 PM, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
quoted
Currently, device drivers, which support both OF and ACPI,
need to call two separate APIs, of_dma_is_coherent() and
acpi_dma_is_coherent()) to determine device coherency attribute.

This patch simplifies this process by introducing a new device
property API, device_dma_is_coherent(), which calls the appropriate
interface based on the booting architecture.

Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
---
   drivers/base/property.c  | 12 ++++++++++++
   include/linux/property.h |  2 ++
   2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/base/property.c b/drivers/base/property.c
index 1d0b116..8123c6e 100644
--- a/drivers/base/property.c
+++ b/drivers/base/property.c
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
   #include <linux/export.h>
   #include <linux/kernel.h>
   #include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/of_address.h>
   #include <linux/property.h>

   /**
@@ -519,3 +520,14 @@ unsigned int device_get_child_node_count(struct device *dev)
   	return count;
   }
   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_get_child_node_count);
+
+bool device_dma_is_coherent(struct device *dev)
+{
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) && dev->of_node)
Do you really need that IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) ?
In other words, dev->of_node should be null for !CONFIG_OF
Yes, but IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) causes the check to be optimized away by the
compiler if CONFIG_OF is not enabled.
Sure but my point was why you need it when just 'dev->of_node' check
is enough. May be I missed something.

Regards,
Santosh
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help