Stefan Wahren writes:
quoted
On Thu, 09 Apr 2015 11:20:10 +0200, Stefan Wahren [off-list ref]
wrote:
quoted
Btw i read that Shawn only want used muxes [1].
[1] -
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2012-August/115779.html
If that is an issue, then I'll just test all three pin groups on my
olinuxino
board. After all it would be really awkward to have only one pin group and
that
one is labeled "i2c_pins_b" ...
from my understanding you are free about the labels. So you could
rename it to "i2c_pins_a" and change the other pin groups.
Theoretically yes, but there are two reasons not to do that:
1) When Fadil Berisha chose the labels he didn't do so arbitrarily. The
labels make sense the way the pinmux table is organised in the datasheet.
(otherwise he sure would have chosen "i2c_pins_a" for the default pin
group on olinuxino).
2) The labels are in use for about two years now by a lot of people. (Yes
it really takes that long to have this merged.) I would hate to break
their setups for no strong reason.
Harald