On 04/09, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 12:07:59PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
quoted
2015-04-09 12:00 GMT+02:00 Thierry Reding [off-list ref]:
quoted
On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 03:22:15PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
quoted
Replace duplicated const keyword for 'emc_parent_clk_names' with proper
array of const pointers to const strings.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <redacted>
---
drivers/clk/tegra/clk-emc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
This would probably better go in via the Tegra tree since the patch that
contains this has only made it to linux-next.
Stephen, Mike, any objections to me taking this?
Applying this without the change for const-ness of parent_names (patch
by Sascha Hauer sent before mine [1]) would introduce a warning -
assign of const to non-const. Any idea to solve it? Immutable branch?
Right, I had missed that. Immutable branch would work, though perhaps
it'd be easier to just defer this until after v4.1-rc1. The warning
shouldn't happen if we leave out this single patch and apply it later
on, right?
Alternatively the whole series could be deferred until after v4.1-rc1.
Yeah I don't really care to make an immutable branch for this
cleanup series. If everyone is ok with waiting until after -rc1
we can apply the Tegra patch then (or you can and we'll get it
through a pull later). We should be able to apply the parts that
go through clk tree though.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project