[PATCH 3/4] clk: hisi: add stub clk driver
From: Leo Yan <hidden>
Date: 2015-03-27 02:08:42
Also in:
linux-devicetree
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 02:22:26PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 07:13:38PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:quoted
+static unsigned long hisi_stub_clk_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, + unsigned long parent_rate) +{...quoted
+ BUG_ON(!stub_clk->lock);...quoted
+static int hisi_stub_clk_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate, + unsigned long parent_rate) +{...quoted
+ BUG_ON(!stub_clk->lock);...quoted
+static long hisi_stub_clk_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate, + unsigned long *parent_rate) +{...quoted
+ BUG_ON(!stub_clk->lock);...quoted
+static struct clk_ops hisi_stub_clk_ops = { + .recalc_rate = hisi_stub_clk_recalc_rate, + .round_rate = hisi_stub_clk_round_rate, + .set_rate = hisi_stub_clk_set_rate, +};...quoted
+static struct clk *_register_stub_clk(struct device *dev, unsigned int id, + const char *name, const char *parent_name, unsigned long flags, + spinlock_t *lock) +{ + struct hisi_stub_clk *stub_clk; + struct clk *clk; + struct clk_init_data init; + + stub_clk = kzalloc(sizeof(*stub_clk), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!stub_clk) { + pr_err("%s: fail to alloc stub clk!\n", __func__); + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); + } + + init.name = name; + init.ops = &hisi_stub_clk_ops; + init.parent_names = parent_name ? &parent_name : NULL; + init.num_parents = parent_name ? 1 : 0; + init.flags = flags; + + stub_clk->hw.init = &init; + stub_clk->id = id; + stub_clk->lock = lock;Under what scenario is it safe to call _register_stub_clk() with a NULL lock argument? If lock is NULL, then every function callable via the ops structure will bug. Rather than doing a test in each method function, do it in _register_stub_clk() - this means we aren't waiting for a NULL pointer deref when one of these method functions gets called.
Will fix to check lock pointer in the function _register_stub_clk(). Thanks, Leo Yan