[PATCH] pinctrl: dt: at91: new binding

On 07/03/2015 at 00:49:55 +0800, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote :

quoted

Sorry but NACK.

I don't want to manage another flavor of the pinmux biding with no real
benefit. I would have been good if we had it from day-1. Now it's too late.

yes we do, we catch but a compiling time instead of RUNTIME which is critical

so I?ll pass on the NACK

If you are changing the binding, how about doing it right this time and
completely drop the current mess?

quoted

Moreover, splitting a binding definition if you have a function given by
multiple banks can be weird and not well understood in regard to our
current group+function definition scheme (Cf. your last example).

Others already do so and this is not complex at all

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com