[RFC PATCH 2/2] Kbuild: avoid partial linking of drivers/built-in.o
From: Ard Biesheuvel <hidden>
Date: 2015-03-30 12:54:50
Also in:
linux-kbuild, lkml
On 30 March 2015 at 14:38, Michal Marek [off-list ref] wrote:
On 2015-03-30 13:49, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:quoted
The recursive partial linking of vmlinux can result in a drivers/built-in.o that is so huge that it interferes with the ability of the linker to emit veneers in the final link stage if the symbols are out of reach. This is caused by the fact that those veneers, which should be emitted close enough to the original call site, can only be emitted after the .text section of drivers/built-in.o, whose size pushes those veneers out of range.Is this a limitation of a particular ARM ABI or a limitation of a state of the art ARM linker or something else? If such a hack is necessary, it needs to be accompanied with an explanation as to in which environments it is needed, whether it can be removed at some point in future, what is the exact error it causes, etc. Also, are you able to gauge the limitation? Will it at some point affect fs/built-in.o or drivers/net/built-in.o?
The limitation results from the fact that ARM branch instructions are limited to 24-bits of relative offset, and depending on the instruction set (ARM or Thumb) this translates to +/- 32 MB or +/- 16 MB respectively. Note that using -ffunction-sections works around the problem as well, but it typically uses more space. There are other archs that add this, to work around a similar issue. The errors it causes are build time linker errors, i.e., after crossing a certain size threshold, you just cannot build vmlinux anymore. It is not something that we would able to remove in the future, as it is simply a result of the ISA capabilities and the build strategy that relies heavily on partial linking. Other linkers would not be able to do a better job, as the drivers/built-in.o(.text) section just exceeds the maximum size that allows a branch instruction to jump out of it. I am not sure whether it would affect other subdirs, but it is not entirely unlikely. A more structural approach would be to limit the contents of the built-in.o files to the mod_init/_exit/_etc input sections, and let those pull in everything else through a libbuilt-in.a at the same level that contains the .text/.data etc, each of which would be combined with the constituent ones as we do for built-in.o now. I haven't played around with this extensively, though.
quoted
So instead, avoid building drivers/built-in.o, and instead, add the constituent parts to the command line of the final link. Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <redacted> --- Makefile | 12 +++++++++++- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile index e734965b1604..1eb6c246a586 100644 --- a/Makefile +++ b/Makefile@@ -558,7 +558,7 @@ scripts: scripts_basic include/config/auto.conf include/config/tristate.conf \ # Objects we will link into vmlinux / subdirs we need to visit init-y := init/ -drivers-y := drivers/ sound/ firmware/ +drivers-y := sound/ firmware/ net-y := net/ libs-y := lib/ core-y := usr/@@ -569,6 +569,16 @@ ifeq ($(dot-config),1) -include include/config/auto.conf ifeq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),) + +# drivers/built-in.o can become huge, which interferes with the linker's +# ability to emit stubs for branch targets that are out of reach for the +# ordinary relative branch instructions +include $(srctree)/drivers/Makefile +drivers-y += $(addprefix drivers/,$(sort $(obj-y))) +drivers-m += $(addprefix drivers/,$(sort $(obj-m)))I think this will break should we ever put a .c file in drivers/ directly.
Yes, it will