Thread (4 messages) 4 messages, 2 authors, 2015-03-26

[PATCH v4] dt-bindings: brcm: rationalize Broadcom documentation naming

From: Rob Herring <hidden>
Date: 2015-03-26 19:00:48
Also in: linux-devicetree, lkml

On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 1:41 AM, Scott Branden [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi Rob,

On 15-03-22 06:20 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
quoted
On 03/20/2015 08:06 PM, Scott Branden wrote:
quoted
This patchset attempts to standardize the naming of dt-bindings
documents based on the Broadcom vendor prefix of brcm.

Although there are no guidelines currently present for how to name
the dt-bindings document the "vendor,binding.txt" style is in use by
some of the other vendors.

Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Gregory Fong <redacted>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com>

Version history would be nice...
Yes, I should have added a cover letter but didn't.  The difference between
versions was minimal: a spelling correction in the commit message text and a
few additional binding files were found that were added between the
versions, along with the Ack's.
quoted
Who did you want to apply this? I can, but I'm worried about merge
conflicts here. Hopefully, you're not also doing lots of changes to
existing bindings.

Yes, it would be great for you to take care of applying this.  There
shouldn't be any merge conflicts as none of these bindings are currently
being updated.  I left a clock binding document out of this patchset at Ray
Jui is updating/renaming the documentation for that binding in a different
patch already.
Okay, thanks. I've applied it.

Rob
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help