[PATCH v3 10/15] serial: stm32-usart: Add STM32 USART Driver
From: Andy Shevchenko <hidden>
Date: 2015-03-17 17:56:58
Also in:
linux-api, linux-arch, linux-devicetree, linux-gpio, linux-serial, lkml
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 7:32 PM, Maxime Coquelin [off-list ref] wrote:
2015-03-13 15:19 GMT+01:00 Andy Shevchenko [off-list ref]:
quoted
quoted
+static void stm32_set_termios(struct uart_port *port, struct ktermios *termios, + struct ktermios *old) +{ + unsigned int baud; + u32 usardiv, mantissa, fraction; + tcflag_t cflag; + u32 cr1, cr2, cr3; + unsigned long flags; + + baud = uart_get_baud_rate(port, termios, old, 0, port->uartclk / 16); + cflag = termios->c_cflag; + + spin_lock_irqsave(&port->lock, flags); + + /* Stop serial port and reset value */ + writel_relaxed(0, port->membase + USART_CR1); + + cr1 = USART_CR1_TE | USART_CR1_RE | USART_CR1_UE | USART_CR1_RXNEIE; + + if (cflag & CSTOPB) + cr2 = USART_CR2_STOP_2B; + + if (cflag & PARENB) { + cr1 |= USART_CR1_PCE; + if ((cflag & CSIZE) == CS8) + cr1 |= USART_CR1_M; + } + + if (cflag & PARODD) + cr1 |= USART_CR1_PS; + + if (cflag & CRTSCTS) + cr3 = USART_CR3_RTSE | USART_CR3_CTSE; + + usardiv = (port->uartclk * 25) / (baud * 4); + mantissa = (usardiv / 100) << USART_BRR_DIV_M_SHIFT; + fraction = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST((usardiv % 100) * 16, 100); + if (fraction & ~USART_BRR_DIV_F_MASK) { + fraction = 0; + mantissa += (1 << USART_BRR_DIV_M_SHIFT); + }So, it's a fractional divider. right? Could it be then fractional divider clock in this first place (see drivers/clk/clk-fractional-divider.c)?I'm not sure it makes sense to represent this baudrate divider within the UART IP as a clock.
You have it already. I mean it should be fractional divider clock. stm32port->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL); + + if (WARN_ON(IS_ERR(stm32port->clk))) + return -EINVAL; + + /* ensure that clk rate is correct by enabling the clk */ + clk_prepare_enable(stm32port->clk); + stm32port->port.uartclk = clk_get_rate(stm32port->clk);
What would be the gain?
Remove custom implementation of the calculations. It will be just one line to refresh the baud rate. I think we have a lot of duplicates here and there in the kernel. It would be nice not to bring another one. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko