On Wed, 2015-03-04 at 13:08 +0100, Maxime Coquelin wrote:

This is because I added also support for COMPILE_TEST coverage as per
Uwe advice,
and thought it was necessary to have an entry for this.
Maybe I'm just wrong?

I missed that you added COMPILE_TEST.

A quick scan of your idea doesn't show any obvious issues. (Note that I
don't really know how people actually use COMPILE_TEST. I guess things
like "make allyesconfig" are involved.)


Paul Bolle