[PATCH v9 01/21] ACPI / table: Use pr_debug() instead of pr_info() for MADT table scanning

On Fri, 2015-03-06 at 20:17 +0000, Grant Likely wrote:

On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 16:39:41 +0800 Hanjun Guo [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

This patch just use pr_debug() instead of pr_info() for ioapic/iosapic,
local apic/x2apic/sapic structures when scanning the MADT table to remove
those verbose information, but leave other structures unchanged.

[]

One nitpick below, but don't respin over this, and don't do a fixup.

[]

quoted

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/tables.c b/drivers/acpi/tables.c

[]

quoted

@@ -61,9 +63,9 @@ void acpi_table_print_madt_entry(struct acpi_subtable_header *header)
 		{
 			struct acpi_madt_local_apic *p =
 			    (struct acpi_madt_local_apic *)header;
-			pr_info("LAPIC (acpi_id[0x%02x] lapic_id[0x%02x] %s)\n",
-				p->processor_id, p->id,
-				(p->lapic_flags & ACPI_MADT_ENABLED) ? "enabled" : "disabled");
+			pr_debug("LAPIC (acpi_id[0x%02x] lapic_id[0x%02x] %s)\n",
+				 p->processor_id, p->id,
+				 (p->lapic_flags & ACPI_MADT_ENABLED) ? "enabled" : "disabled");

The whitespace changes makes each 1 line change into 3 line changes. In
these situations, I would chose to leave the whitespace alone to keep
the diffstat as small as possible. It makes it less likely to conflict
with other patches and easier to find context.

I think it's mostly better to use a consistent indentation style
regardless of the number in whitespace changes surrounding the change.