[PATCH] ARM: dts: imx: Add dr_mode host setting to all host-only usb instances
From: Peter Chen <hidden>
Date: 2015-03-04 02:04:35
Also in:
linux-devicetree, lkml
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 10:08:09AM -0500, Matt Porter wrote:
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 12:43:36PM +0800, Peter Chen wrote:quoted
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 11:41:35AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:quoted
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 09:06:00AM -0500, Matt Porter wrote:quoted
The chipidea driver adds an extra line of spam to the log when a host-only chipidea instance is left set to the default of a dual role controller. [ 2.010873] ci_hdrc ci_hdrc.1: doesn't support gadget Set the dr_mode property to host on all the host-only nodes to avoid this warning.It is not an warning, it is dev_info.True enough, it's info level but is essentially warning that, in the case of instances that are restricted to host only (at the SoC level), that the DT hardware description is incorrect. Yes, it's benign, but if the dtsi is corrected for those parts we don't have to see that message.
You are right.
quoted
In fact, imx28, imx6sl and imx6sx's second controller is dual-role controller, we only set dr_mode at board's dts according to design unless the controller's capability register is incorrect.The patch doesn't set dr_mode to host on the second controller for the imx6sl or imx6sx, only on the third host-only controller. If imx28's second controller is really dual-role capable then the reference manual is incorrect and I can drop that hunk in v2. I only have imx6q and imx6d parts in hand to verify so for the rest I went by the RM claim of which controllers were host-only.
Maybe IC guys don't want to export that imx28's that capabilities, so don't need to change.
quoted
So, sorry, I don't think this change is necessary.I can correct the set of instances that should have dr_mode set to host in v2 of this. We clearly have some that should have this set in their SoC .dtsi to have the hardware description correct. Will that work for you or do you want the SoC-specific cases of this property to be only reflected in the board level dts?
After thinking more, it is a benefit fix, and doesn't need to do any changes, thanks. Acked-by: Peter Chen <redacted> -- Best Regards, Peter Chen