Hi Wei,
On 27/02/15 11:41, weiyj_lk at 163.com wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
From: Wei Yongjun <redacted>
Add the missing unlock before return from function kvm_vgic_create()
in the error handling case.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <redacted>
---
virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
index 0cc6ab6..4b2c2e7 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
@@ -1583,8 +1583,10 @@ int kvm_vgic_create(struct kvm *kvm, u32 type)
* emulation. So check this here again. KVM_CREATE_DEVICE does
* the proper checks already.
*/
- if (type == KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_VGIC_V2 && !vgic->can_emulate_gicv2)
- return -ENODEV;
+ if (type == KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_VGIC_V2 && !vgic->can_emulate_gicv2) {
+ ret = -ENODEV;
+ goto out;
+ }
Ah, good catch. Embarrassing that that could slip through ...
Acked-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Out of curiosity: did you see it hang or was this just by looking at the
code? I thought that I tested this case ...
Cheers,
Andre.