Thread (55 messages) 55 messages, 10 authors, 2015-03-09
STALE4140d

[RFC/RFT PATCH 0/3] arm64: KVM: work around incoherency with uncached guest mappings

From: Ard Biesheuvel <hidden>
Date: 2015-02-20 14:37:25
Also in: kvm, kvmarm

On 20 February 2015 at 14:29, Andrew Jones [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 06:57:24PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
quoted

On 19/02/2015 18:55, Andrew Jones wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
(I don't have an exact number for how many times it went to EL1 because
 access_mair() doesn't have a trace point.)
(I got the 62873 number by testing a 3rd kernel build that only had patch
 3/3 applied to the base, and counting kvm_toggle_cache events.)
(The number 50 is the number of kvm_toggle_cache events *without* 3/3
 applied.)

I consider this bad news because, even considering it only goes to EL2,
it goes a ton more than it used to. I realize patch 3/3 isn't the final
plan for enabling traps though.
If a full guest boots, can you try timing a kernel compile?
Guests boot. I used an 8 vcpu, 14G memory guest; compiled the kernel 4
times inside the guest for each host kernel; base and mair. I dropped
the time from the first run of each set, and captured the other 3.
Command line used below. Time is from the
  Elapsed (wall clock) time (h:mm:ss or m:ss):
output of /usr/bin/time - the host's wall clock.

  /usr/bin/time --verbose ssh $VM 'cd kernel && make -s clean && make -s -j8'

Results:
base: 3:06.11 3:07.00 3:10.93
mair: 3:08.47 3:06.75 3:04.76

So looks like the 3 orders of magnitude greater number of traps
(only to el2) don't impact kernel compiles.
OK, good! That was what I was hoping for, obviously.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Then I thought I'd be able to quick measure the number of cycles
a trap to el2 takes with this kvm-unit-tests test

int main(void)
{
        unsigned long start, end;
        unsigned int sctlr;

        asm volatile(
        "       mrs %0, sctlr_el1\n"
        "       msr pmcr_el0, %1\n"
        : "=&r" (sctlr) : "r" (5));

        asm volatile(
        "       mrs %0, pmccntr_el0\n"
        "       msr sctlr_el1, %2\n"
        "       mrs %1, pmccntr_el0\n"
        : "=&r" (start), "=&r" (end) : "r" (sctlr));

        printf("%llx\n", end - start);
        return 0;
}

after applying this patch to kvm
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp.S b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp.S
index bb91b6fc63861..5de39d740aa58 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp.S
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp.S
@@ -770,7 +770,7 @@

        mrs     x2, mdcr_el2
        and     x2, x2, #MDCR_EL2_HPMN_MASK
-       orr     x2, x2, #(MDCR_EL2_TPM | MDCR_EL2_TPMCR)
+//     orr     x2, x2, #(MDCR_EL2_TPM | MDCR_EL2_TPMCR)
        orr     x2, x2, #(MDCR_EL2_TDRA | MDCR_EL2_TDOSA)

        // Check for KVM_ARM64_DEBUG_DIRTY, and set debug to trap
But I get zero for the cycle count. Not sure what I'm missing.
No clue tbh. Does the counter work as expected in the host?

-- 
Ard.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help