Thread (18 messages) 18 messages, 6 authors, 2015-02-11

Continuing kallsyms failures - large kernels, XIP kernels, and large XIP kernels

From: Russell King - ARM Linux <hidden>
Date: 2015-02-04 00:03:08

On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 12:22:53AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 12:29:30PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
quoted
On Fri, 30 Jan 2015, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
quoted
+#ifdef CONFIG_XIP_KERNEL
+/*
+ * __data_loc is not only the LMA of the data section, but also the VMA of
+ * the end of the .rodata section.  This must not overlap the VMA of the
+ * data section.  Since the .text section starts in module space, and that
+ * is always below the .data section, this should be sufficient.
+ */
+ASSERT((_data >= __data_loc), "Text section oversize")
+#endif
I agree with this patch.

Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <redacted>

This might not prevent a config leading to this from happening, but at 
least it makes the issue much clearer.  XIP kernel was created for 
systems where the total amount of RAM is often smaller than the imposed
size limit here.
Yes, I expect more of Arnd's randconfigs to fail with this patch applied.

I did also notice that we still have swapper_pg_dir at _data - 0x4000
for XIP kernels - so the above check is slightly too lenient.  A better
threshold for __data_loc might be MODULES_END, since we can't allow the
XIP part to overlap into RAM.

#ifdef CONFIG_HIGHMEM
#define MODULES_END             (PAGE_OFFSET - PMD_SIZE)
#else
#define MODULES_END             (PAGE_OFFSET)
#endif
It looks like we have cases where this falsely triggers.  Consider EFM32:

CONFIG_DRAM_BASE=0x88000000
CONFIG_DRAM_SIZE=0x00400000
CONFIG_FLASH_MEM_BASE=0x8c000000
CONFIG_FLASH_SIZE=0x01000000

This means that we quite legally end up with the .data section below the
.text section, which makes:

ASSERT((_data >= __data_loc), "Text section oversize") 

falsely trigger.

The linker has the capacity to specify regions of ROM and RAM in the
linker file, I wonder if we should be using those for XIP.  Merely
adding the MEMORY table to the linker file is not good enough - we
also need to explicitly tell the linker which memory regions to place
the output sections, otherwise the linker ends up making assumptions.

What that means is... asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h breaks for us.

Any ideas?  I think using the MEMORY table would be the best approach,
because that should allow us to properly verify that the resulting
binary should fit in the memory regions.

-- 
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help