[PATCH] genirq: better describe IRQF_NO_SUSPEND semantics
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
Date: 2015-02-27 22:40:37
Also in:
lkml
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
Date: 2015-02-27 22:40:37
Also in:
lkml
On Friday, February 27, 2015 03:23:13 PM Jonathan Corbet wrote:
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 23:41:05 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
quoted
Applied (with Peter's ack) to the docs tree.Well, I've applied it too in the meantime. :-) Also I'll have more commits on top of it, so it's better if it goes through my tree I think, if you don't mind.Gee, I feel like I've been here before :) In the future, would you like me to avoid taking patches to Documentation/power?
Well, I tend to apply them as a rule, unless I overlook them. That usually happens if they aren't CCed to me directly or to linux-pm. But yeah, you can safely avoid patches touching Documentation/power/ or Documentation/acpi/, I'll be taking care of them.
I'll drop it out of my tree.
Thanks! -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.