Thread (7 messages) 7 messages, 4 authors, 2015-02-27

[PATCH] genirq: better describe IRQF_NO_SUSPEND semantics

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
Date: 2015-02-27 22:40:37
Also in: lkml

On Friday, February 27, 2015 03:23:13 PM Jonathan Corbet wrote:
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 23:41:05 +0100
"Rafael J. Wysocki" [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
quoted
Applied (with Peter's ack) to the docs tree.  
Well, I've applied it too in the meantime. :-)

Also I'll have more commits on top of it, so it's better if it goes through
my tree I think, if you don't mind.
Gee, I feel like I've been here before :)

In the future, would you like me to avoid taking patches to
Documentation/power?
Well, I tend to apply them as a rule, unless I overlook them.  That usually
happens if they aren't CCed to me directly or to linux-pm.

But yeah, you can safely avoid patches touching Documentation/power/ or
Documentation/acpi/, I'll be taking care of them.
I'll drop it out of my tree.
Thanks!


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help