On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 11:13:57PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

On Friday, February 27, 2015 09:38:59 AM Peter Zijlstra wrote:

quoted

Seems good to me. Should I take this through tip/irq ?

I can apply it along with the previous IRQF_NO_SUSPEND documentation patch
from Mark Rutland if you ACK it for me. :-)

Works for me,

Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>

quoted

Also, should we warn if people use enable_irq_wake() where there is only
a single descriptor with NO_SUSPEND?

We probably should do that, but that would be a separate patch IMO?

Agreed. Just wanted to raise the point.